Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] Art Problems: Can Museum Matchmaking Work For You?

Left Paddy Johnson, Right Michael Darling

Ever wonder how to get your art into museum collections? Museum Exchange co-founder Michael Darling joins me to discuss how his company connects artwork with museums that want it.

Museum Exchange functions like a matchmaking service - museums write proposals for artwork they want, and donors choose the best fit. It's working: small regional museums are building collections, challenging works are finding homes, and donors and institutions are getting what they need.

Listen as Darling, and I get into the thick of it and learn more about a process that might work for you or someone you know!

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] Art Problems: Who Is Carrie Scott?

Left, Paddy Johnson, Right, Carrie Scott

Is any question more vexing to artists than, "What do you do?"

No, because it's impossible to answer!

This week on the podcast, I turned the tables and asked curator, consultant, and media personality Carrie Scott the same questions she asks artists in her interviews.

What do you do? Who do you make work for? What made you decide to pursue a career in the arts?

In asking these questions, our conversation touches on Seen, her newest membership for collectors and artists, whether you can feel art, and who gets to monopolize parenthood conversations in the art world.

PS Carrie Scott offers Art Problems listeners 20% off her consulting services for artists with the code 20off. You can get that when you join her membership, Seen!

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] Art Problems: How to Manage an Art Career When You’re Over 60

Does advanced age feel more like a liability than a strength? Welcome to the art world, which can suuuuck for mid-career artists.

Ageism in the art world is more than just a problem—it's a barrier that can feel insurmountable, especially for women artists over 60. (And yes, while it affects everyone, the impact on women is particularly harsh.)

I'm not going to pretend ageism doesn't exist. I'm not going to pretend ageism doesn't exist. It does, and it will impact you. However, how you view your age will determine the extent of its effects on your career. YOU are not beholden to another person's preconceptions. Your age does not have to be a limitation. It is a strength waiting to be unleashed.

I'm tackling the issue head-on this week on the Art Problems podcast by sharing seven game-changing tips that will help you:

  • Reframe your mindset and embrace your ambition

  • Master essential skills for today's art world

  • Transform your studio practice to work with you, not against you

Consider these tips a toolkit for visibility, success, and artistic fulfillment in your 60s and beyond.

The best part? Many of these strategies are just as powerful for younger artists. It's never too early (or too late) to take control of your art career!

Relevant links:

How to Master Technology When You Hate Technology

https://www.paddyjohnson.com/podcast-episodes-blog/art-problems-how-to-master-technology-when-you-hate-technology

Lorna Simpson interviewed by Dean Baquet in T Magazine

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/10/17/t-magazine/lorna-simpson-ebony-magazine-race-gender.html

Every Nicole Eisenman Picture Tells a Story, Ian Parker, The New Yorker

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/03/01/every-nicole-eisenman-picture-tells-a-story

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] Art Problems: Are You Using A.I. Enough?

The problem most artists don't know they have with A.I.? They aren't using it enough.

If you don't use it, you won't know all it can do to help you.

But you also won't be aware of its limitations.

In this podcast, I walk you through exactly how AI can help you save time in the studio, and when you need to switch out the AI for an expert.

Here's the spoiler alert on what AI can and can't do: It's great for agendas and basic writing and editing. I use it almost every day and it helps me enormously.

But it does have limitations. It can't fill in the information you don't give it, and it won't identify specific problems unless you ask it to do so.

As a means of answering those AI limitations, I've created strategic email scripts that artists can use to get better shows, additional funding, and even acquisitions. The scripts come in three separate documents - one for galleries, one for museums, and one for Instagram - and retail at $129 or $49 for the gallery scripts alone. But for a limited time, I'm offering 15% off. All you gotta do to get the coupon is fill in your information when the pop up appears.

Happy listening -- and Netvvrking!

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] Art Problems: Post Hurricane Helene with Artist and Accountant Hannah Cole

Image from Hannah Cole

You wouldn't think a town in the mountains would be devastated by a hurricane. That's what happens to cities on the coastlines. But we live in a world undeniably affected by climate change, so all bets are off.

Today on the Art Problems podcast I speak with Hannah Cole an Artist and Accountant based in Asheville, an artist-friendly city heavily impacted by Hurricane Helene.

She shares how the hurricane has affected her and her family over the last several days, which includes losing her life's work, being exposed to toxic chemicals and without water since last Friday. Many artists are in the exact same position as Hannah or worse.

Listen to the podcast to learn more about how the hurricane aftermath affects the residents of Asheville.

Here's how you can help:

Money Bootcamp:
Join Money Bootcamp

Mutual Aid:
Hannah's PayPal Mutual Aid

Arts AVL

Follow Sunlight Tax on Instagram, who has been sharing Venmo accounts of small businesses in Asheville.

If you need help:

FEMA Disaster Relief

Rauschenber EmergencyArtGrants

CERF+ (for craft-based artists but craft is defined VERY broadly)

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] Art Problems: Do You Need a Gallery?

Naudline Pierre, The Mythic Age at James Cohan

There was a time when I couldn't imagine even asking this question. Of course, you need a gallery. How else will you sell your work to collectors?


But now, in the age of Instagram, Substack, and websites, maybe it's not as urgent a need. You can connect with buyers on your own.

Even galleries don't always think they need galleries. Many have closed and become advisory firms. Many have become advisory firms and then returned to the brick-and-mortar space!

In this episode of Art Problems, I talk about this new world — how to manage gallery closures and what you need to make a go of it on your own.

Relevant links: https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2024/09/24/new-york-gallery-closures-leave-artists-fending-for-themselves

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] Art Problems: Your Residency is a Feminist Act

Is it possible to leave your family for a couple of months to make art on a residency and not feel guilty for doing it?

For many of us, probably not, which is why on this podcast, I speak with artist Danielle Mysliwiec about why her experience at Surf Point, The Tides Institute, and Long Meadow Art Residency is worth any guilt incurred in the process.

Put yourself and your career first whenever possible.

In this podcast, we talk about residencies, networking, feminism, and even the new Miranda July book All Fours.

Relevant links:

https://longmeadowartresidency.com/

https://www.surfpoint.me/

https://www.tidesinstitute.org/studioworks-artist-in-residence-program/

https://www.daniellemysliwiec.com/

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] Art Problems: Is There a Dead Body Trend in Art?

The Armory Show at Javits Center

What's with the dead bodies? Yes, that's an actual question from the New York fairs.

This week on the podcast, I invited the artist William Powhida on to the show ostensibly to discuss what we saw last week.

The discussion, though, ended up going far deeper. On the podcast, we talk about:

What we want from art in an increasingly tumultuous world

What landscapes, florals, and a dead body trend at the fair say about the world.

The shifting landscape of art, which includes many new faces and names

Plus, we talk about all the work in the shows that sparked thought!

For the full list of artists we discuss see the show notes!

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] Art Problems: Behind the Scenes of Zero Art Fair with Artists Jennifer Dalton and William Powhida

Jennifer Dalton (Left), William Powhida (Right)

Is there a scenario in which giving your work away for free is preferable to storing it? For more than 80 artists, the answer to this question is called the Zero Art Fair. (In other words, if the storage fees become too high, then yes, free is better than the trash.)

The fair, which took place last weekend at Upstate Art Weekend, helped artists place more than 200 works and close to half a million dollars in art.

Today on the Art Problems Podcast I talk to the artists behind the fair, Jennifer Dalton and William Powhida. Let's get the skinny direct from the source!

Relevant links:

https://www.zeroartfair.com/home

http://www.jenniferdalton.com/

https://williampowhida.com/

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] Art Problems: Do You Need to be a Bad Person to be a Good Artist?

How selfish can you be without turning into a jerk no one wants to be around? And is being a jerk an acceptable price if the result is getting what you want?

I like to think the answer to that question is no, but I dive into this topic on today's episode of Art Problems because we all know artists who aren't all that generous but have a good deal of success.

And it's at least worth exploring why we have to deal with so many mean yet successful people in our lives!

Relevant links:

Does it take a bad person to be a good athlete

https://aeon.co/essays/does-it-take-a-bad-person-to-be-a-good-athlete

Roger Federer's Convocation Speech

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqWUuYTcG-o

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] Art Problems: Do You Have a Plan for Your Art After You Die?

Left Ursula Davila-Villa, Right Anna Stothart

What will happen to your art when you die?

Have you made plans?

Do you feel too nervous about the thought to even make plans?

The problem with this is that if you want your art cared for after your death, you have put plans in place within your lifetime.

That's why I decided to speak with estate planning legacy experts Ursula Davila-Villa and Anna Stothart of Davila-Villa & Stothart.

During this conversation, we talk about who we preserve culture for and why, some of the nuts and bolts around legacy planning, and what changes to the field have presented advancement and challenges.

Join me, for a conversation that balances the practical, the intellectual, and the emotional stakes of artistic legacy.

READ TRANSCRIPT HERE

Podcast Episode 64: 

 

Paddy: You're listening to the Art Problems Podcast, episode 64. I'm your host, Paddy Johnson. This is the podcast where we talk about how to get more shows, grants, and residencies. And on today's podcast, I'm gonna talk about a much requested topic for this show, estate planning. How can you ensure a legacy for your art? To take a deep dive, into this topic, I invited legacy planning experts, Ursula Davila Villa and Anna Stothart of Davila Villa and Stothart to talk about what the job is and what you can do even if you don't have a lot of money and even if you don't have a huge career. And those things can include building community, creating oral histories and creating an inventory for your work. We'll talk about a whole lot more, but I'll let the experts lead the way.  

Paddy: Ursula, Anna, welcome to the show.  

Anna: Thank you. Thanks.  

Paddy: Well, I want to kick this off with a couple introductions. Ursula, can you introduce yourself and give us a brief explanation of what you do and how you got into the field? And then Anna, can you do the same? and how you and Ursula met.  

Ursula: I'm inspired by the latter question, which is how we met because we met a long time ago when I was a very young assistant curator, just beginning my first job out of graduate school at the Blanton Museum in Austin, Texas. And Anna came and asked me, for a job, and she became my intern. So we were both young and very enthusiastic. I would say we may have lacked experience. We both were very encouraged by the work, and that's how we met. So going from there, I'm originally from Mexico. I'm an art historian. by training and began my career in the arts in the curatorial sphere. I don't think even though I work as a curator for many years, I felt my heart was in curatorial work for the long haul.I decided to begin a project independent of everything and it was an experiment that it was going to either fail or worked. And I would say, This was in 2017, so five years into doing it, six years. It has in general succeeded, which is to work directly with artists and families on legacy stewardship and legacy planning, along with studio management.  

Ursula: It brought me back again to working very closely with artists. And since 2021, Anna and I partnered to do this work together which has made it both much more fun. I would say that without the partnership, I don't know if I would have continued to push through because there are some moments where the problems can be challenging and you definitely need two minds to kind of break it down and find ways forward. And maybe that's a good sideways to Anna.  

Anna: So I have a very similar trajectory as Ursula, as she mentioned, we met. As I was applying for graduate schools and all around the country. And so I was an intern with her for about two years. I think it started in what, 2005, I think it was. So way back, it feels like now. I also have my background in art history. I graduated from Tufts University in Boston. So while I enjoyed making exhibitions and installing shows, I found working with artists in a bigger picture capacity, much more fun. Fulfilling in many ways and much more suited to my personality and my skill set.  

Paddy: The website that you have describes the work that you do as developing and growing the foundational pillars of an artist's legacy. Scholarly recognition. Institutional visibility and strengthen commercial markets. And in our pre interview for this podcast, I had asked you to describe what you do. And a lot of our conversation took place around how hard it was to describe that work. And I think we probably circled that for, you know, close to an hour. So I thought we could start broad and narrow the conversation down from there. So like starting with a foundational principle, how do we preserve the culture around us? And from the perspective of the families and individuals, I'd also like to start with who, because if we don't have a who, the how doesn't really matter. So so who's. Whose, whose legacy are we preserving and, and how are we doing that?  

Ursula: Change only happens when the community comes together. So I think in asking who preserves for who are we preserving? I think it's, it's a dual question and taking that back to thinking who does it for whom I think is we as a, as a community should do it. And for future societies to experience and live through, which is the luxury that we now have as a society to re experience the art of ancient times and so on. That is just very broadly speaking. How the how to do it, I think there are many, many ways, and I I feel like we're at a moment where creativity around preservation shifting with the changes that we're seeing in technology will allow for different pathways and different solutions to questions around preservation of culture. But from my perspective, I think that it was good to remember that , we're not doing this just for the vanity of an artist or for the preservation of wealth in some cases. Or even for, very specific communities that are supporting mainstream institutions that have been cultivating high philanthropies that enable culture to exist in certain cities.  

Ursula: I think that there, there is an array of stakeholders and. Part of what I think Ana and I have been trying to, to do is sharing the knowledge that we ourselves are getting, reaching, accessing, making that know how accessible and available to others without monetizing knowledge. And I think that's really important. That, paired with awareness, education, and commitment to cultural preservation one step at a time, one person at a time, may help us see beyond the differences, to think in a hundred years from now, the history of this moment will be told by these artifacts, these objects, these stories, and these narratives.I think that the contemporary artists that we have the honor to work with, in a way, are giving us richness that will benefit others in generations to come. It's just the question is how, how to achieve that and how to do it in an equitable manner. So it's not just a certain few that will be able to, to preserve culture for, for a certain select few, but rather to, to make it more expansive.  

Anna: Yeah, I think just to sort of add to that briefly, I think, in both of our roles as curators and working at galleries, we saw how both, institutions, so to speak, aid in preserving the culture and sort of legacy of an artist in different ways. And so I think that as Ursula says, it's right. It is the community. It's all sort of elements. People in academia, people in institutions, people in art galleries, collectors, all of those things that kind of come together to preserve the, an artist's legacy by supporting them and by writing essays and by, making exhibitions with the work. I think there's all sorts of ways that that can happen.  

Paddy: Sometimes artists who don't have visibilities or market. built around their work will start organizing their work with the understanding that they may not have visibility within their lifetime. And I'm just wondering if you could name some examples of artists who you've worked with who have done some of that and what that looks like.  

Ursula: I mean, I, I'm a firm believer that artists can impact their local communities and maybe it's part of, you know, I did graduate school in New York, but my first full time job was in Austin, Texas and I grew up in Mexico City. So I went from very big cities. I moved from Los Angeles to a much smaller place back in 2005 when I moved to Austin. Well, it was a vibrant city. It was a small city. And I was working with a Latin American collection that brought together countries from all over the continent and thinking locally and for the audience that was there, both students and local members or members of the Austin community was part of the job I remember some of UT students that had never been to museums because UT has an admissions policy that brings in the 10 best students from different high schools around the state. So some of them really came from very, very small towns in Texas, had never been to a museum, and they had to come to the museum as part of curricula. And it was incredible to see how, for some, not everyone, but some, it would be a life changing experience to enter a gallery and see a work of art. So I would say that all art has that power, some more than others, but there is a real sense that when you connect with local communities, you can have an impact that is long lasting.  

Ursula: So I don't think legacy means international recognition always. It might be for some, but it's not for everyone. I don't think that that's where it leaves, nor does it mean market success in every all cases, there is a need for some degree of financial capacity to do certain things as much as we advocate for preservation and stewardship of legacies. We also very much encourage stewards not to do work for entirely for free. A lot of the stewardship work is, being done by women. So it goes back to questions around care and invisibility of labor and the fact that women are, are doing the majority of it. So we are trying to, also shed light to the, to the question of stewardship needs to come with understanding of what the work is and how it can be compensated. But I would say that for artists that we've worked with that did not occupy in a particular space within the large. scope of contemporary art, it was finding their community. And there was one estate we worked with and the artist had passed away and he was a ceramicist. We always go by the works of the work felt to us very powerful, very interesting.  

Ursula: And we went directly to the different communities of ceramicists across the country. That particular project had the goal of placing works of his. in collections around the country as donations. And the response we got was immense because, while he was not a well known artist in the contemporary field, he was very well known and very respected amongst ceramicists. So there was a real enthusiasm when we began conversations. And we are not specialists on ceramics, so we had to do a lot of research to identify And we, brought in somebody that had, was an artist, a ceramicist, that helped us put together that research. So I would say that that is, is critical.And the other for people that are not in New York City, New York tends to think of itself as a bit like the center of the world. And while I live there, I am not from there, and having lived in other places, I feel like, There is a constant or that tendency to look towards the bigger cities as the places and I feel like it's the opposite part of the richness that the U.S. has is the locality. How specific each local community can be and how little gestures can become important. So, for example, having our display in the local hospital may be meaningful to the people that. Are visiting friends or family at the hospital or even the patients themselves. And that doesn't mean that your work will be in a museum, but it does mean that it has an impact to the people that are in your community. And I think that that at times may even be more important than if there are large retrospectives in particular places. I feel like art has a power that very few things have, but it's finding ways to create this level of partnership and community building that that can yield it. Otherwise, It's, it's hard to, to envision it. I really, really believe that, that it's there.  

Anna: But it's finding the right sort of path in, because, while it seems that there's all these artists who are largely unknown and suddenly later in their career or once in a state comes. It's like there gets, there's a lot of press around, suddenly there's this huge market boom around and all the collectors are buying for work and they become hugely successful. You know, when you look at the number of artists that are out there who have been out there that's a very small fraction of people making work, but that doesn't make their work less significant. I think that there are other sort of necessary paths for many people. I mean, even artists who maybe did have their heyday. There's an artist that we're working with who had a number of shows in the between the seventies and the nineties. And then, in the early nineties decided to keep her sculpture practice more private and all the while was making really incredible sculpture in her studio and doing more sort of collaborative social political sort of work more publicly. And now later in life and Has decided like, what am I going to do with all of this stuff? And so we're working with her to kind of make those decisions and determine how best to find homes for those things, or even just bring that area of her practice, more visibility because it didn't really have any between the nineties and today, so it's, everyone kind of has their own, the work kind of needs something a little bit different depending on their background.  

Paddy: Yeah. And like, how important is it for an artist to be organized with their stuff? Like have their inventory cataloged or whatever in terms of preserving legacy?  

Ursula: If there is a plan for posthumous legacy stewardship, it's critical. Like if doing it in your lifetime, if you can't, If not, somebody else will have to do it. But the difference if you do it in your lifetime is that there are questions that only artists can answer. So if you don't do it in your lifetime, whomever might do it in future may have to make educated guesses. So there's great benefit to artists. You know, devoting some time, some of them hate it, some of it, it can be very boring, that's one of the things people tend to do. It's like we are not archivists, we can work with archivists or registrars to catalogue work, but we ourselves don't do that work, but it is critical. I would also say that, you know, if you're thinking about curricula, I, strongly feel like captions for art could be a great potential for education that some of it in the last few years, like understanding the difference between media, only artists that have worked with the media nowadays really know it, but if you have not experienced it, live it or seen it, touch it A lot of people don't know what a serigraph might be, how different it might be than a woodcut, even though they're entirely different. So I think there is great potential to doing the work, and then, For some, every caption, every media has a story to tell. Some artists , have a lot to say about materials they chose. And while that might not enter the inventory, they're always, in my experience, every time I've done the work, it's almost like you need to do an oral history project alongside cataloging work because there is always a story to be told. When the artist is going through their archive, assessing titles, dates and registration. So there is the practical side of it that is great. And then there's this other part that in doing that, there are stories that will be revealing and likely very important and useful in the future.  

Paddy: So the, the captions themselves, you're saying tell a story.  

Ursula: Yeah. I'm firm. I feel like not only the title and date, like, those two are straightforward. Yeah. I think, yeah, what are the materials? that, that make a work. Some artists choose to be very coy , not to disclose everything that's in the work. Some choose to be very explicit and list absolutely everything. Some are repetitive, some are inconsistent. So I think that there are a lot of, it's like metadata for the work is the caption. Yeah.  

Anna: And even sometimes you'll see when you're trying, when you're tracing the sort of history of an object, either as a curator or let's say you're working at a gallery and have a new relationship with a sort of later career artist, it's, you realize that sometimes there were subtle shifts either in the way the date appears or the way the title appears and even just asking questions can provide a whole wealth of information. And so a lot of the work we do is Asking questions around certain details that often originate in the caption that then provide us with a significant amount of information about decisions that were made when the work was produced or shortly thereafter, or how those decisions came to be made. And a lot of times it's. You know, another party that's weighing in on, Oh, you should do it like this or, Oh, you should do it like that. But then our primary objective is always to sort of get to the heart of what the artist's intent was and what their wishes were. And and how do we record that in.  

Paddy: I am somebody who actually really likes captions and I did not know more than they were from that, from your perspective. So that is very, that is something that I have learned this podcast. And you mentioned briefly that technology Or technology developments have really aided with this. Like what are some examples of that? How is technology helping us? I'm just asking because I think within the group of artists that I work with, who are living artists usually mid career, there's a lot of anxiety over technology right now due to AI scraping images and training on them things like that. Not all technology advances are bad. And so I think it'd be interesting to just hear like how the field has advanced.  

Ursula: I mean, I would say I am also anxious about AI. There's so many open questions. And I do think that there's so little written into the law. I mean, the already technology is not very regulated, but AI is. It's definitely infringing in some aspects of copyright law, and it's leaving a lot of open questions. So I think the anxiety that the artistic community is feeling is, is warranted. And I do think that the big companies owe creators, artists, a more clear pathway for how intellectual property will be guarded as AI advances. That is a critical shift that We yet we'll see what what it will bring, I think, in terms of how technology has helped. There's some practical things, for example, a oral history, which I think is one of the most effective tools that can help preserve and document that. is available to many that you can train in doing good interviews and think through how to, there's always ethical issues around oral histories, but there are many ways to address them without it becoming overwhelming or difficult. The ability to have a AI generated transcriptions of oral history. Well, not ideal to just leave a transcript as a I product. It always, I think, requires one to review the transcript by really listening to the oral history, but access to technology that both means you can quickly record, really listen, transcribe, And save a document means that what in the past would have taken a lot of labor and time and even maybe would have made it expensive to find the right microphone to record somebody's voice.  

Ursula: Now you can do it with a telephone on hand. And if on the luxury of things, I did Mike and have it recorded, but in many cases you can almost just do it over your phone. And that becomes an important record and document going forward. That, I think, is where technology has really shifted things and made tools available at either for free or prices that are not indiscriminate. I think digital catalog resonance is another field that has really shifted the ability for artists that need a catalog resonance. Not every artist should do that one. Or needs one. But for some that need it, in the past, it was always a printed book that was highly, highly difficult to achieve because the cost was insurmountable. And it's not that the costs, all of them have gone away, but the ability to create a digital catalog resume that can change and shift over time, has made that a possibility for many more artists that in, I would say 10 years ago, or maybe 20 years ago, it would have been very difficult. And it was really just a select few that were able to do the research and pay for printing the book, a possibility. So there are many aspects that are helping, I think, you know, colleagues of ours from small data that focuses on technology as a way of, preservation are also actively researching ways in which we could collectively do it and translating what that means, because it requires specialized knowledge. I feel optimistic that there are people in the field, both learning and training, and The sharing in the knowledge that they're occurring to, to make this more accessible, especially to artists of an older generation that work with a lot of moving media that is aging rapidly. But there is, I think, optimism around how much can be achieved with what we have today at hand.  

Paddy: I love that. That's a, I feel like that's Really optimistic. And I think also gives artists, I think just points them to tools that are available to them. Now, Ursula, you've said that legacy planning is as diverse as artists. And I'm currently going through the process of redesigning the curriculum around common problems, diving into learning design and that sort of thing. And I'm having a hard time. Like wrapping my head around why the process needs to be so individualized. And so I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about why legacy planning has to be so specific to the particular artist's career.  

Ursula: I mean, I would say, and Anna, feel free to jump in here. Part of it is that legacy planning is undoubtedly a legal mechanism as well. Like if you are an artist planning your legacy, you're likely drafting an estate plan, which will involve a lawyer and all the mechanisms, the legal mechanisms are rather patriarchal. and archaic. We have chosen to work with very specific artists that have all fallen outside of mainstream activity. So while we use what we have available to us from a legal perspective, so you know, we're not reinventing an estate plan, we certainly are thinking how the, how to shift things to meet the practice and not the other way around, not to make the practice too bit whatever structures we have available to us, because if we go by that, they're both patriarchal, archaic, at times bias. So I think that there are many commonalities. So, for example, having a clean inventory, having a sense of what you have, how much of it How well is preserved like it's physical condition are aspects that you can apply across the board, no matter who you are and what kind of work you create. But once you have very basic road data, I feel that part of the job of what, you know, this new field that is being defined as legacy stores means is to creatively think, what do we have in our field that can help us achieve what the artist ambitions? So part of the role and work is protecting not just the tangible property, but artistic intent, which is quite intangible. Maybe that's a good moment for Anna.  

Anna: Yeah, and I think, it's also important, even though there are many things each artist can do, it's, they don't always want to do all of the things that are there for them. So, legacy preservation for one artist may just be making sure that the major works that they've created in their lifetime end up in public institutions in some capacity, but less focused on archive or less focused on other sort of forms of scholarship. The scholarship will come. when the works are in public collections and future intellectual scholars, curators can sort of build on that. Whereas some, it's all about the archive. It's all about making sure that their entire archive is placed somewhere where students and scholars will have access to it. So I think, to Ursula's point, it's the reason it's sort of driven By the individual artists is, is not only because of the nature of their work, which also comes into play, but also what their specific desires are and making sure that we are one following what their goals are. And of course, guiding them. If you know, if someone were to say like, I just want everything, I don't care what happens. I hope every, if someone throws it away, I don't care. Obviously we will guide them to say, maybe that's not the direction to go. But, and that there are other options that are maybe less difficult in your lifetime. But I do think that certain artists whose practices are multidisciplinary, or perhaps were collaborative in some sense, or have gone in multiple different directions, I think that there has to be a bit more of a nuanced way to help them express themselves. Explore options for preserving their legacy. And that's, that's the, that's the work that we do with them is that we look at each artist situation and we help guide them or give them the options that are out there for them. And once they make a decision, then we continue to support them along the way.  

Paddy: You know one of the things that came up and has come up a couple times in this conversation is the notion of patriarchy and how that really if we were to do nothing, then I think patriarchy would, would be a win even.  

Anna: Would always win will forever win. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.  

Paddy: Yes. Thank you.  

Paddy: And I guess I'm wondering how that comes up in your work, where you run into patriarchy and what tools you have at your disposal to push against that a little.  

Anna: I mean, I think we run into it every, at every turn and every aspect of our sort of careers. Artists run into it constantly. I would say the way that we've been dealing with it is to begin to develop new models and new forms of partnership that are collaborative.  

Ursula: In the United States, I think patriarchy is very intertwined with capitalism. So if we are to And power. Capitalism and power. I would say, like, if we both think of, I mean, at first it was our mutual, you know, This is not something we we purposely discuss. I think it's just how we are when we were both curators. I think we both thought of ourselves more as facilitators. And maybe that's what made me not, you know, a great curator. I just didn't like to under the spotlight. So I think that in unmoving away from the spotlight and being behind the scenes seems counterintuitive in a world in which profiling oneself is featuring your person as part of your brand is part of what is helping many succeed. It's not that I don't think that's a model that can help go forward, but I think what we have decided in terms of core values that very much push back against patriarchy, and I would say capitalism, is that while we need to pay Art bills and make a living. So when I decided to move away from the gallery, I gave up a good paying job. That was in the commercial sphere that normally is at the top tier of how much you can make in the art world. Right at, you know, I would say at a moment that I could have potentially made more. And I made the decision for personal reasons. I had recently become a mother, but I also deeply felt like the conversations I wanted to have with artists were just not possible in a commercial space. So how we pushed in a way would be to say, well, we both gave up better paying jobs in order to, and without, making it about the money, but ultimately it is an important part of making a living and planning ahead. Another would be, that's a very personal response to what we decided to do in a very specific moment. in time for ourselves. But the other is the artists that we have chosen to work with. I do think of many of the older artists that we work with as role models for things that totally fall outside of the art and the art field and art history, but rather how they lived life, how they confronted discrimination, sidelining, gaslighting, and they kept on going. I mean, these are artists that For many decades were not recognized and while some are now important voices, they've lived a longer years they're cloaked of invisibility than under a spotlight. And I think the fragility that comes with a parent's success at an elder age is something that really humanizes them. The work itself tells a story that is less about what the market wanted at a certain point in time, and much more what they almost what they needed to create in order to exist. And I think that that pushes against the patriarchy. It doesn't conform with what is expected, but rather creates out of pure necessity, no matter the consequences. And I think looking at the artists as inspiration as like, what, what have they given us and how do we give it back?  

Ursula: It's part of what we try to do, including, you know, trying to place work with museums, knowing that museums are struggling, there is less money going towards them. them. There is much more, there are a lot of issues that have to do with institutional biases that they are confronting. So patiently working with them is another way. Nowadays, time is, seems like a luxury. And that's part of what we purposely decide to bring into our work. Giving our colleagues time because they needed a lot of stress and making quick and rapid decisions seems to be the trend and we push back against that. Yeah, it's time is an important part of the work that we do.  

Paddy: Oh, I love that because I do feel like that trend of having to make quick decisions is, I mean, I don't even know if it's a trend. I think it's a condition, right? Like it's part of the contemporary experience and pushing back against that, I think it's really important. We've talked a lot about like how difficult it is to sort of nail down exactly what you're You know, what legacy planning is, but I also thought a pretty important part of talking about it is what it, what it isn't because that also came up in our pre interview in terms of like, what kind of preconceptions there are out there. And I thought it might be also useful to talk about that. Can you tell me what kinds of things. people most commonly think you do that you don't?  

Anna: I think, well, easier to say sort of positions that we aren't. People think that we're art advisors. We are not. We are also not a gallery. We don't function like a gallery. We don't have a space. We don't. So even though we place work, sell works to museums on behalf of the artists, Compensation is very different than what it would be with a gallery partnership. We're not lawyers. And so, we don't do the sort of legal drafting and those kinds of things. And so kind of going back to what we were just talking about, this is where the partnerships come into play. And this is where I think one can create a more equitable environment that actually supports the artist. So by involving people like us. To aid in decision making in sometimes translating and sometimes advocating on their behalf with a third party, we are kind of evening the playing field a little bit, bringing our experience and our knowledge to the table on their behalf. So I think when it comes to again, I think I'm answering in a very big way because it's hard as hard as it is to say what we do. It's also difficult to say specifically what we don't do because. Sometimes we'll start with like, Oh, you know, we don't do this. But then there, a circumstance arises where an artist needs something from us. And we're like, okay, well, we look at it from this angle. We can support the artists in this way. So it's really always artists. It's always artists driven, but it's. The best way to think about the work that we do is that we are, we are advocates, we are facilitators, we are, I don't know, stewards or partners. And, and this isn't just for the artists we provide. It's, we, we want to be good partners for the galleries that are supporting the artists, for the curators that are supporting the artists, for the lawyers that are working with the artists. So we're kind of that kind of interlocutor, which is trying to make everyone's partnerships a little easier, I would say. I don't know.  

Paddy: You know, one of the things that strikes me about the decision that both of you made to go out and do this work is how courageous it was. And it's not just because, and this may be just my perspective, but it's not just because you, Gave up money to do that and like health insurance and all the rest. That is a pretty big deal. Yeah. But I think also because you decided to do something that has A lot of emotional labor in it. You know, we use words like legacy and I think they sound a little sterile compared to what I imagine the conversations that you must have with the people you work with when you are dealing with legacy, I can't speak for anybody else, but I know that I don't particularly want to think about my own death. I would imagine there's some hesitancy, but also like that you have to deal with family members and deal with like, how do you not take on the grief? of your clients.  

Ursula: Oh, it's very hard. I mean, that's part of the joy of the work. Exactly what you say. I do think the part that I love the most about the work is how artists are rendered in all their humanity. You don't get just a slice of them. You get the totality of them. And with that comes A lot of imperfection. All of us are imperfect humans and you get the best, you get the difficult, you get a times the ugly, but you know, that's, that's a condition of being a human being said that, you know, you can imagine that the joys can be as high as the parts that are difficult. And I have only experienced one passing meaning. An artist that I was working with who passed away, and I didn't expect my own grief to be as it was because we've talked so much about death. It was in how I was raised, that is very much a matter of fact. It's repeated, you know, almost daily. Like it will happen just as a matter of when. I think that that is what, the work is, and what makes it valuable. When I graduated from grad school, I, the head of my program gave me an advice. I came to his office very perplexed because I had studied museum studies. And by the end of two years, I said to him, I don't understand. I came so excited about museums and I leave a program that was very critical. It was critical theory, completely confused. Museums are very complicated, challenging places. I'm not feeling reassured by it. What knowledge I accrued in going and working for institutions that have so much baggage. He, you know, smile and laugh and said, well , that's so sweet. You're very young. And that's just life. That's a reality. And what you need to do is know where your line is. There will always be conflicting realities ahead of you is for you. You need to just assess where are the lines that you're not willing to cross in the path of moving through the motions. If you have that clarity of mind, you'll do good. Because there is no black and white, there will always be gray. And I think that that was the point in which when I left the gallery for me, there was a line there. If I was to continue working in the arts, it needed to be in a different role, in a different capacity, like one layered. I felt like the art world has become very flattened. I needed more depth to the relationships. That's me, but , it's a very personal question and I should answer as well.  

Anna: No, no, no. I mean, I think I feel the same and it is there is a lot of emotional labor and not even just around questions of death, but anxiety around where the work is going to end up, anxiety around the artist's future legacy, and anxiety around being able to support themselves for the rest of their life. And I think a lot of that comes our way. And so. To be perfectly honest, I, as Ursula said in the beginning, I certainly would not be able to do this alone. Like my partnership with Ursula, I mean, us being friends helps, you know, but it also, I really think us being able to support each other. And sometimes I, I dive a little too deep into the emotional side of things and Ursula sort of has to pull me back out and give me some perspective because while these are professional relationships, as I think many of us in this industry know, it is very personal. We come into this because we love it deeply. We care about the artists that we are working with. We care about the work. We believe that it all matters. And so, it is difficult not to sort of go in fully. Which is, I think, which also makes us very good at what we do is that we're able to kind of do that come from sort of come with empathy, come with but also our experience and intellect and creative sides, it's, we're able to kind of do this full service thing, but it is, it can be difficult. And I think what I, Ursula has been doing this longer than I have, and it is, I have not experienced the passing of an artist that I am close with, and we'll say, I'm not looking forward to the future of that, but I think the thing that I am, Really enjoying is the opportunity to spend time with them, to get to know them in a way that I wouldn't have in any other capacity. Yeah. And getting to be a part of helping them make decisions that will lead to an outcome that is their, their wish. That feels very, that feels very good. And while many of them don't necessarily want to talk about their death, all of them want to talk about what happens to their work. All of them. Like I would say, like everybody wants to know what is going to happen to the stuff, what is going to happen to all of the things that I have spent my life making. And so sometimes that's the avenue in.  

Paddy: You know, one of the things that I came up in our previous discussion, I just felt it was, it spoke to me kind of pretty powerfully was how central artists are to this world and how often they're, they've, are quite disenfranchised from the art world itself. And I wondered if you could talk about that because it seems like something that might be kind of adjacent to what you do, but it came up and I felt like that was something that was maybe not really that like it was part of a core belief in something that you felt needed rectifying.  

Anna: I mean, I would say that. None of us would be here, I mean, we wouldn't even be having this conversation if it wasn't for artists and the work that they make, you know, I'm the daughter of an artist. My father is an artist who, spent his whole life making work, but received recognition in a very sort of niche market, but not sort of widely recognized totally undervalued himself, continues to do so. So, I would say that, Seeing the amount of time and energy and effort and dedication it takes to be an artist and then working in institutions that support that work and seeing the power imbalance. It was always really shocking to me because when you think of it, say it so literally, it doesn't really make any sense because none of us would be doing this if it weren't for them and their work. And the work is going to be the thing that outlasts us all. And so giving consideration to decisions around those things that will outlast us all seems of the utmost importance.  

Ursula: I mean, and said that. I, I do think artists are very disenfranchised from the current systems institutions. It's , very tied to a power and capital and artists that conform to more capitalistic forces at times tend to do better than those that do not. That's not always the case, but it is it's a reasonable observation. I think that it goes maybe back to the original question, like why and who preserves what? Think art is It's important to societies. I grew up, of course, in Mexico, where you see art everywhere. And I was purposely decided to have murals all over the city to educate people in, in a way that was , very popular and accessible. And over time, I think it, it becomes this point of pride of what we have as Mexicans in, in our buildings and how much access we have to really great works of art. And I do think that. If we prioritize art as something important for what makes us human, what makes a society, how do we think about civility and civics? Art has the power to do that. And while there are moments that all of that core beliefs are shaken, and I feel like there's just forces against that, that are pushing for other directions. I do strongly believe that still, there are moments that People will experience something special in the face of a powerful work of art that will make them see the world in a slightly different way. And that is the way that we become a better society. So if that's the power that art can give us and the ones that are behind that are artists, why then are they not protected, empowered, and placed in society in a way that would value you? them as what the work brings to society as a whole. It's moving in that direction in all, all the humanities, you know, like musicians, you can apply it to not just visual artists, but All cultural producers where not culture cannot always be monetized.  

Ursula: Not always will be for consumption and entertainment, but the value is different and more lasting. So how do we change that as like core beliefs of society? It, again, I think community building, partnership building is part of the solution awareness and education is another one. And for that, considering how the arts in all the disciplines that we're impact public schools and access to that? It's a critical question. So, what we don't do that directly for artists that care about education, we of course try to think about ways to encourage partnerships that will be lasting in the context of a like true primary school education. I don't mean it in another way. So again, it's to think about legacy outside of the traditional spaces, museums, collections, archives, and to think of it, how does it Occupy a little bit of curricula either at university level or if it's possible in certain conditions at primary school level if that's accessible and of importance and interest to the artist. I don't know how. I don't think we have a magic wand to change it, but just naming it saying this is this is wrong. This is not how we should concede their artists in our society. I think it's part of what We decided to do, to leave our jobs, to say, we're going to do it differently and directly with them consider other avenues. We don't know all of them and we are going to be humble in this process, but we're going to try to find. All their pathways to communicate.  

Paddy: This was a couple of years ago, but I was talking to people about how to make the membership better, but I wanted to also find out like what kinds of things they were, they were excited about, what kinds of things they were afraid of, and I remember very vividly, somebody telling me that. The thing he was really afraid of was that he was doing this all for nothing and that like, his children would have to throw out his art. I didn't like that.  

Anna: Yeah. Yeah. I mean, it happened, unfortunately, that does happen. And that's why it's good for people to make it very clear what their wishes are. And Think about ways, because I think today gifting everything is not an option as much as it maybe once was years ago. And so I think making decisions in an artist's lifetime as to how, To keep that from, from happening, giving work to friends, giving work, like Ursula said, local schools, things like that, to make sure that there is some sort of life beyond, so that it doesn't end up thrown away.  

Paddy: Just to clarify that, you're saying that, like, it used to be more able to gift your work to a museum, and now museums It's more difficult.  

Anna: About why that is storage? Resources , a number of museums for from inception to the sort of early days, I believe took a lot of gifts sort of, , from their patrons important benefactor would pass away and they would take on the collection. And I think a number of them have amassed such huge collections that they are now having to sort of assess everything and think like, can we care for not only the work we have, but how much more work can we take on? And so I think that they are being much more discerning when it comes to Taking on gifts, they almost look at it more with a sort of microscope than they would if it was something that they were purchasing in many ways because it, you know, it's not just taking on something you have to care for it forever. It's their responsibility. And so that comes with conservation, that comes with storage, that comes with a number of things. So it is becoming more and more difficult. We're finding to have gifting conversations.  

Ursula: I don't want to repeat. I think that museums are, have shifted and changed and that has just created a more complicated sphere in which collecting has changed over time, not to mention the corrections around biases embedded in a lot of permanent collections across the country where there was representation that was not reflecting the society the museums are living with. So I think that that is part of it. I would say, the anxiety over the pandemic. I'm doing all of these for nothing. It's not uncommon and you would be surprised how many artists say that even those that you would argue, there's already so many manifestations that is not for nothing. I think that, I think being an artist is one of the hardest jobs. It's almost like you can't choose it. Like they're really, the artists that I've known, and this is well known and not well known, it's almost like an existential existence. They have to do the work in order to. exist and breathe is not necessarily almost like a profession. I think it's a very different, very personal journey. And I think that if that's what it means, of course it feels very existential to think, does it end with your own life ending? You know, for most of us, morals and mortals and humans, whatever legacy we leave behind, maybe children, maybe certain things of care, but It doesn't carry these bigger questions of who does what and how and with what money.  

Ursula: It's much more circumspect. I think artists feel almost like this moral obligation, but for those that have families, there is that possibility of having, think of that, a lot of families don't want to do the work or they begin to do the work only to find that it's very difficult, laborious, long term, can be very isolating. I think there's a real push and move nowadays for families. doing legacy stewardship work to connect amongst them to feel companionship and support. And I find it's a very generous field where people support and speak to each other. But it all begins with artists either deciding to bring on their families and asking if they want to be part of it or not. And for those that do not have families, it goes back to community. There's no state sponsorship for cultural preservation in the United States. So it's not like local museums can have the budget and the capacity to simply care for the culture of its local artists. There are no grants to do a lot of this work either. Whereas in Europe, there's a lot of funding that can provide that level of support in the U. S. is, is much more difficult. While at the same time has the benefits of you know, if there are any of capitalism where there, there are ways of monetizing some of the work, like licensing of images and work that, that is And I think that's something that's seldom done in European contexts. I would say Latin America, and that's just , I care about the context and the and the place I come from. It's much more precarious. Nevertheless, I would say their models in Latin America of cultural preservation that are very grassroots oriented. So I feel again, it's part of the existential drive is talking to others about it.  

Ursula: I think for artists is very difficult to talk about this issue with other artists because it reveals a degree of vulnerability and nobody. It's comfortable doing that. So part of, I think what we have encouraged is to have those conversations with people that are a willing ear. There are many more people in the field that are doing the kind of work we are doing. And I would say, you know, there's more work than right now people working it. So there is great potential for this field to continue to grow because a lot of the times the anxiety can just ease by talking through the options that exist. And once that renders itself more clearly, I think artists are able to visualize what can happen for them in the way that they would want or like, or what cannot. And even knowing what cannot happen, I think, brings reassurance. I think anxiety just continues to be the driving force if conversations are not happening. But it's very normal, I think, to feel that level of anxiety and to question whether everything's for nothing. I think that's a very valid question. There are answers to it, but it's, it's not a bad question to ask. I think. Yeah.  

Paddy: Yeah. So I want to thank Both of you for coming on the show because I feel like you've just offered a level of, I don't know, intellectual rigor that is really needed. I wondered, how can people find out more about what you do? Outside of the podcast obviously.  

Anna: Our website. It's dvs.art and it has our bios. It has sort of exhibitions we've done. It has, our areas of practice and it also has a page of resources. So, ursula in the early years, I think read every book, went to every seminar, did all of the things to sort of become an expert in legacy all things legacy stewardship. And so there's a whole list of resources that people can access that are kind of ways to begin thinking about this. So it's accessible. We recommend going and checking it out. Yeah. And then, we both. have Instagrams, but we don't, I guess we don't, we aren't very so good at Instagram by posting things about our work. As people can imagine, it's, I think we, we often, the work that we do necessarily needs to be kind of discreet. So we're not always putting it everywhere, but that's also kind of a way to know what we're up to. I don't know, Ursula, am I missing anything?  

Ursula: No, I would say the, the, the website and yes, We have Instagram presences, but we're not I wouldn't point them as a reference of what we do.  

Paddy: Yeah. You know, every time I see a dentist, for example, with an Instagram, I'm like, I don't trust this dentist because they like, and I sort of feel the same with legacy planning, like. The Instagram is not where you need to be spending your time.  

Anna: We're, it's not where we're doing a lot of business. I mean, it shows kind of our travels and what we're looking at and sort of, if we're working on a project with an artist that becomes public, but you'll see a lot of my cat, for example, that's, that's really what, what I get featured gets featured on mine. The website is the best. Yeah.  

Paddy: Okay. So we'll have that in the show notes, Anna and Ursula. Thank you so much for coming on the show. And I think that is all.  

Anna: Great. Thank you for having us so much.  

 

Paddy  

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] Art Problems: Meet Ceri Hand, Registered Coach for Artists

Have you ever talked to someone and instantly recognized that person as your friend and colleague?

Meet Ceri Hand, a registered coach for artists, an instant friend and colleague.

She's based in London.

Worked at the highest levels of the art world.

And knows from experience exactly what artists need to do to move their careers forward.

In this podcast she talks about:

  1. How to gain visibility if you live in a remote area

  2. How to prepare for studio visits.

  3. Why editing your work is one of the most important skills you can develop as an artist.

Beyond all this, Ceri is highly empathetic and a joy to listen to. Make her part of your day!

Relevant links: https://cerihand.com/

READ TRANSCRIPT HERE

Podcast Episode 63: 

 

You're listening to the Art Problems Podcast, episode 63. I'm your host, Paddy Johnson. This is the podcast where we talk about how to get more shows, grants, and residencies. And today on the show, I speak with Ceri Hand, a registered coach for artists and high level creative professionals. Ceri has worked with Sotheby's London. Goldsmiths and the British arts council. And she is committed to helping a hundred thousand professionals by 2025.  

Paddy: Ceri, welcome to the show. 

Ceri: Thank you so much for having me, Paddy. What an absolute pleasure to join you.  

Paddy: So I am super excited to have you here because you have such an extensive background in the arts and we have some, uh, colleagues in common. I think you recently, semi recently, uh, spoke to Christian Baveros Fane, who's a critic and also entrepreneur. 

Paddy: I think. And I wanted to begin by talking to you about how you got into the arts. And I'm particularly interested in your position as the Associate Director of Institutional Relationships at Simon Lee Gallery and then later of the founder of your gallery. gallery, which operated from 2008 to 2014. Can you just give us a sense of, uh, what your career trajectory has looked like?  

Ceri: Sure. Thank you so much for inviting me. Um, I trained as an artist originally. So, um, but I went to an art school, um, in the North of England. So not one of the sort of fancy she, she ones. But it was perfect for me and that it was a mixed media degree. And I left the obligatory, uh, traveling after college came back to the city.  

Ceri: It was Bradford in the North of England and set up an artist studio and co run that studio. for, for a group of about 20 artist makers with other artists. So I carried on being an artist until I went back to do an MA in printmaking and critical theory. And, um, I guess it was the perfect finding for me in that it was kind of, it was the left, Left center, left wing department in the college, and it gave me the, I guess, the radical evaluation of what I was doing.  

Ceri: I guess the, um, criticality, if you like, the discursiveness around art making, I think was really where I cut my chops. So it was, um, making and thinking and articulating the thought process, I guess. Um, I decided that I needed to leave. Bradford to move to London. So as soon as my, um, art show was finished, I got on a bus with a TV, portable TV, and a rucksack and went and kicked on my friend's floor in London, um, and then started doing freelance work.  

Ceri: Uh, I worked in a sandwich shop, a friend's sandwich shop whilst I basically tried to understand the landscape of the art world in London. And it was a very different time before social media. And so it really was about like picking up zines or. You know, brochures, uh, whatever, wherever you could find an artist network, you have to jump on buses.  

Ceri: It was impossible to kind of search, um, or just do a kind of scroll as to where artists studios were. So I ended up working.  

Paddy: like, well, what year was that approximately? That was, 

Ceri: uh, 97, 1997, 98, you know, I'm kind of old. I've been in the art world for 30 years now. So I. Hit a London that was really much more spread out.  

Ceri: The commercial art scene really hadn't taken roots. There were a few amazing places like Maureen Paley or Lisson Gallery. There were great public spaces, but there was a really brilliant DIY scene, you know, so I finally found my.  

Paddy: spread out across the city.  

Ceri: Oh yeah, enormous. Um, it was spread out across the city, but where I landed was the East End, which is now, it still is one of the biggest artist networks in, um, Europe, I believe, for the arts.  

Ceri: So I happened to be in Hackney, which was where I was part of the developing art scene there, where the YBAs, I guess, were getting off the ground. And I started working for a women's art magazine called Make, and I started as an intern and then within a couple of years I ended up being the director. And it was a charity that published an art magazine specialising of women artists, but it also had this library and resource that was started as a slide library. For women's work and it had people like the Guerrilla Girls through to other artists that were perhaps less of well known and actually there was no hierarchy other than they were making work and um, Submitting slides and it developed into this incredible resource. So I started working with them in 98, 99. And I think in 99, we launched this award for women artists called the 1999 Olay Award for Women in Association with Olay and Make Magazine. And it was, I guess, the start of really bridging this public private because at the time in 99, the public and private sector were much more separate in the UK in particular.  

Ceri: So the idea of the private sector supporting the publicly funded sector by collaborating on an art prize, or we commissioned artworks for Channel 4. Um, and actually, It was for ITV, because they went out before Coronation Street, which is a popular soap opera in the UK. And, um, we had people like Rachel Whiteread's mum. She was amazing. And Tracey Emin did what they called adcasts. And it became a big splash on Newsnight and this idea of should they get into partnerships. And, um, I guess the reason I'm sharing that is because it, I really, I guess, didn't understand, um, why artists should be always working on the edges of things. Why, when really they were making things that were as important and as instructive to how we live and how we think as things that were being commissioned for TV and film and in much more kind of popular areas. I suppose.  

Paddy: I think like that, that particular, uh, point of view is really interesting too, because it comes out of a particular time, right? Like the 1990s and aughts, there's a lot of intellectual activity talking about. Um, maybe like the, not necessarily the difference of pop culture, but how pop culture and visual arts are kind of integrated. And I feel like the writers at that time that did the best were the ones who could really kind of give us a set of codes and the artists that I think many of us were very interested in at that time were also able to. Do things that kind of straddle that line in some way. And I think, you know, the time that we're in now is, uh, you know, quite different that time, I think was really unique that in part for the dominance of television.  

Ceri: That's right. I think, um, there were, in fact, the first person on my podcast, Extraordinary Creatives, was Sue Webster, who was, uh, really important and influential in London at that time, working with her then partner, Tim Noble, and doing lots of kind of DIY, um, Uh, shows and making a huge impact and selling work to Saatchi, despite the fact, you know, they also, um, came, actually studied in Bradford. So, this idea that artists could move to the centre and start doing, creating, you know, Scenes, if you like, was important, but also the fact that people were getting thirsty and excited and encouraged by artists thinking at that time. It's really important to thinking in a slightly different way. And I know lots of artists feel they get the ick when, um, we talk about being entrepreneurial or, you know, but actually it was that kind of, um, we have nothing, we're making stuff from nothing and we can make an impact. It was that punk kind of DIY spirit that in a weird way was also the reason why I think it's important to think about how we can make opportunities for artists today, drawing on some of that spirit.  

Paddy: You would say that the punk DIY spirit, you like the ugly word we might attach to it, is entrepreneurial. Even if, uh, as a coach, I won't speak for you, but as for, for me personally, as a coach, I don't necessarily see entrepreneurial as a bad word. And I do think that it's a quality that many artists have.  

Ceri: Yeah, that's right. I think a lot of people are working today in setting up and establishing their own small or micro businesses or trying to have a positive impact on the planet. I think there is a lot of creativity in the way that they connect with people or communicate with people. And of course there are crossovers, but I think like you Pally, one of the things that I'm committed to is helping artists to, um, earn more money, make more money doing what they love, but also have a bigger impact in the world. I guess, back to your original question, the reason that I mentioned that particular time, because it was formative in me thinking, okay, so I moved from being an artist to actually that discursiveness of like encouraging people to talk through ideas or to have ideas and manifest them in reality in some way. I guess I saw people doing that in the public and private sector, and I also saw no reason why artists couldn't and shouldn't be earning more money doing what they love. So, um, whilst I, I worked for a charity for that period of time, and then I moved to run a residency program back in the north of England after working at MAPE for a few years. I then moved to the north of England, which is a bit like, I mean, American terms, you know, it's no distance whatsoever, but in the UK, the kind of the north south divide was a big thing in that time. So learning how to create artists work with artists in a rural location outside of the centre to attract press and publicity, to commission work outside and as well as get it touring. I guess that really helped me to understand if you can attract press, if you can attract sales from working outside of the city. I guess that was a way that I could learn how to help artists. Um, if I move back to the city to think more expansively about their practice and how they connect and communicate their work at a much grander scale.  

Paddy: I feel like we need to transport you here to the U. S. too so that you can help all of us because there are So many, I mean, I think that that is something in the U S that a lot of the artists who are listening to this podcast are really concerned about, you know, some of them live in city centers, but a lot of them don't, you know, and what do you do to get attention for your work when you live in a place where people don't visit that often? You know, also, how do you get people to pay attention to the press that you do get? When they may not get to that location. And so I think all of those things are really important to an artist's career. I did want to circle back to something that you had said a little bit earlier, where you talked about how. You felt like artists were sidelined a little bit from the center of things, whatever, whatever we decide things means, but, uh, front, maybe from the center of economic activity within the art world, do you feel like that was this, uh, sentiment that you felt in the 1990s? Does that carry through to today or do you feel like that is different?  

Paddy: Do you feel like there are more opportunities for artists or less or is it all just different?  

Ceri: Um, I think what I've understood now, like you Polly, coaching artists, um, every single day I hang out with artists. So I do a virtual and in real life studio visits with artists and I guess the same things are reoccurring, which is one of the reasons that I launched my course, Unlock Your Art World Network, which is an affordable online course, is because the one thing we don't get taught at art school or anywhere else is how to build relationships if you're an introvert or you would rather be in the studio. And I know you speak to this a lot too. And I think as a self confessed creative introvert myself, you know, I've learned some of the tools. of how to connect and communicate on a much larger scale by building deep relationships one at a time. And I think the same, it doesn't matter in my opinion, where you are in the world, where you live and work, as long as you are committed to participating in the contemporary art world that you want to participate in.  

Ceri: And I say that because, again, something I know you speak to, Pari, is that there are many art worlds, and there are many overlapping art worlds, and being honest about which one you want to participate in is important, because there are rules, codes, systems, that demystifying that is incredibly important, but in the first instance, being honest about what kind of relationships you want to have, who, with, and why, is the first step. So I hear very often from artists, you know, that they want to meet more curators or more collectors or more gallerists. And I say, OK, so who? Which ones? And actually there is, uh, there's just this blanket terminology when, because they have a sense that that's what they should do or they want to do, whereas in actual fact, they haven't done the research on who they want to be connected to or in alignment with, and they don't know what that person does or is responsible for. So, in the first instance, when we start identifying, you know, what kinds of people do we want to run with? Who are, who are our running mates, if you like? Who is our tribe? And being honest about what kind of work they do. So, let's say, for example, I'm an artist working in a rural space, in a rural town, either it's in the UK or America.  

Ceri: I have an amazing studio because I can afford to have a bigger studio. So there's a really good reason as to why you might want to work outside of an economic centre. However, wanting people to see the work is possible now, which it wasn't back in the 90s, in that you can have online studio visits. And I think taking responsibility for having as many studio visits as possible, online or in real life, is part of how you build relationships with curators, with collectors, with writers, with the art world ecology and so I think if we were to say, okay, I'm a digital artist, I work outside of the centre, just like the artist Raphael Lozano Hemmer. who I did a commission with when I was working at Somerset House. You know, I couldn't do, I couldn't afford, as even though I was working in an institution, we couldn't afford to send me to Montreal to have a studio visit with Raphael. So we had to conduct our studio visits online and we still have the most incredible connection where we could get to commissioning his work for a major public artwork from having those online studio visits. So I think that the desire has to be there for you to actually want to participate and then doing a bit of research and going deep on what has that person contributed and why would I be in alignment with them is the first step that I would say.  

Ceri: Does that align with your thoughts?  

Paddy: Yeah, I do have a question, uh, I guess about the question of honesty, right? Because that came up when you were talking a couple of times about, uh, the importance of really being honest. About who you want to connect to. Now, I think the, the piece here where I would love a little bit of clarity is like, does honesty mean like being honest with yourself about how much work this is, or being honest about yourself, about what you actually want? Like, what does, what does honesty mean in, in the. situations that you have laid out?  

Ceri: Yeah, that's a great question. Okay. So let's say we take an artist who really wants to be represented. by a commercial gallery. Yeah. And I spell out a lot of this. Actually, I have a free resource on my website, kerryhammond.com, which is how to work with commercial galleries and how to maintain relationships with commercial galleries. So a little bit of it would be knowing firstly, whether you have a consistent body of work by that, I mean, a consistent body of work over a period of time. that has a line of inquiry, if you like, there is a continuous line of inquiry over a number of years. So we're not just talking about one small body of work that is great. That may well be enough. If you're an artist coming out of a brilliant art school, for example, you're going to probably have more eyes on you as an emerging artist. But really, most commercial galleries want to see evidence of an artist's commitment to participating in the contemporary art world. That means that they're making work that has a unique point of view, they have something to say, and they are committed to trying to say it in the medium that suits their idea manifestation in the best possible way. That they have committed to trying to show locally, nationally, and internationally. That they are, um, participating by going to see other people's shows, by getting to know curators, by reading up as to kind of what's interesting, for the time that they happen to be living through.  

Ceri: So every artist coming through at the moment is participating in a particular part of their culture. And there will be things that are of interest to commercial galleries that they want to be seen as representing artists that are contributing to the time that they're living through. So we see commercial galleries, for example, interest in artists who are working with technology or the technologies of today that are interested in the climate crisis, that are interested in what new biotech might do in identity politics. Commercial galleries want to be representing artists that are seen to be contributing to the ideas of our time. So, if you are making work that is Contributing in that way. Then knowing who your peers are, knowing which commercial galleries speak to the ideas that you want to interrogate is important. Going to commercial gallery shows, getting to know the directors because they, like artists are idiosyncratic in the, you know, what their interests are, what they are curious about. Every single commercial gallery has a different flavor to it. Because they're run by different people with different kinds of ideas about what they find exciting and interesting in the world.  

Ceri: So if you want to be represented, it's that old adage, Paddy, you know, that if you want some love, you have to give it first. You know, so if you are interested in being represented, then you have to turn up to commercial gallery shows. You have to get to know other artists who are represented. You have to pay homage by complimenting somebody who's, who's put a lot of effort into showing up at an art fair and risking everything to take an artist who makes kind of crazy wild shit and try and sell it at the arse end of nowhere in another country.  

Ceri: You know, it's an incredible contribution that those people are trying to make. So if you want to participate, you have to identify. what you're prepared to do in order to participate. So if you are prepared to make a consistent body of work, If you are interested in inviting people to the studio to talk to you about your work, if you are interested in supporting other artists, other curators, other writers, by, you know, commenting on what they're doing and celebrating what they do, because it's all a two way street.  

Ceri: The artist is at the heart of the art world for sure, but they are part of a social system. They're part of an economic and social system. where you all support each other. And so whilst I believe, like you do Paddy, that artists are the central part and the most fundamentally important part of the art world, I also believe that the people who have success in the way that they want to, on their own terms, it's about being honest about what they're prepared to contribute. It's not just about making your own work. It's about adding value to other people.  

Paddy: I think that's so smart. And I do think that that's, that's something that I, um, that comes up inside the membership that I run as well. Uh, and I think one struggle that many artists have is the amount of time That seems to be required to do this versus the amount of time that they have available to them to actually do the things. And, uh, on one level, you know, there's, uh, it's really true. Like there's a lot to do, and this is a career that requires a lot from people. Um, on the other, I think there's, you know, a question also of like, Being able to prioritize and it's, it's not even necessarily being able to prioritize, but as you have said, so eloquently kind of understanding where you want to participate so that your efforts are, you're not just spinning your wheels, you have a little bit more purpose and impact in what you're doing. I am wondering though, like. Like, just how much time do you think is required? Like, is there, is there a set amount of time?  

Ceri: Yeah. I think in Unlock Your Art World Network, I recommend between two to four hours a week. And the reason that I'm going to break that down a little bit more, because I think there is, there's really a few steps to getting clarity and I think before I know all the artists listening will be thinking, Oh no, there's more to do. There's more to do. In fact, I would advocate. I think a great sustainable creative career is made from being more committed and determined to identifying what you really, really want, which is that part about honesty, which is if you want a major solo show, then you focus on what you need to do to get a major solo show first. And that's about breaking down into bite sized chunks the things that would be required in order to have a major solo show. So let's say we take that quite literally, that is, first of all we've got to make sure we've got an incredible body of work. You know, that we are, um, we have an editing process to be constantly reflecting on the work that we're making.  

Ceri: So I would recommend you do a quarterly studio edit, for example. where you stand back and you edit out the wheat from the chaff, where you actually, you've got by the end of the year, you've got a major body of work, and you only show to other people the best of your work. I think very often, you know, um, it's easy to think I want a major solo show, but actually you're waiting until things are perfect. And I think you have to edit as you go and bring people into your journey Um, throughout the whole of the year, which is why studio visits are so important. I would say it's one of the most important things you could do is to take responsibility for your creative career by having at least one studio visit a month and I know that's going to make a lot of people's hair curl, but we're talking about, it could be a 30 minute. online studio visit with somebody. It could be a virtual coffee. When we're talking about studio visits, we're talking about opportunities to have interesting and exciting conversations about your work.  

Ceri: So if you take responsibility for bringing people into your orbit as often as possible, you're going to create opportunities for yourself this year and next year. So you're not waiting until you've finished that whole body of work in order to land the solo show. No curator really wants to turn up and be pitched to have a solo show. They want to come in early at that journey with an artist to understand what can we do together? How can we build something that's exciting? And how can I participate in giving you the opportunity of a lifetime? So I always advocate for the fact that artists are usually more ready than they think. and they have to be willing to have conversations even when things are at early stages at sketch stages, at process stages, because for a curator like me, I've curated over 250 shows, and very rarely did any of those shows start out with what the artist thought they were going to be at the beginning. It's been, it's a process of transference, of enthusiasm, and skills, and knowledge exchange, and there's a whole bunch of So, the most important thing that any artist can do is to have as many studio visits as possible with as diverse a range of people in the art world as possible. So that includes other established artists. It includes writers, press, it includes curators at all stages of their journey. So curators that are coming fresh out of college, as well as the established ones. You know, not everybody can have a studio visit with Hansel or Gobrist from the Serpentine Gallery, for example.  

Ceri: He's one of the most famous curators in the world, you know, it's just not possible. So there are curators that who are into the same weird shit as you're into. Those are your people. So you should be inviting people as often as possible into the studio and igniting each other's enthusiasms as you go. So if we start thinking about great quality of career, it's really about subtraction. It's not about addition. It's about getting clear on what it is you really want, and then just chunking down the steps that are going to help you to deliver that amazing show. There's no point in doing 300 really shit things. Because it takes up as much energy. It's doing one absolutely mind blowing thing. So, uh, we're talking about quality over quantity. Context is everything. Your running mates are everything. I hope that makes sense.  

Paddy: I love the way that you put that, because I feel like subtracting over addition is something when we talk about time that feels empowering to people, right? Like to be able to do less, but to focus on those things and do them better is really, I think what is going to make a difference in an artist's career. And as you get more Established as you start getting, seeing more success. I always say that generally you get more busy, not less, but you have more agency over the time that you have. And that is where you measure. That success. Now, one of the things that's sort of coming up in it for me anyway, and everything that you've said, there are really two things, one, you can really see the depth of your experience, the 30 years you've spent in the art world, because everything that comes out of your mouth has that experience embedded in it. You really understand how the art world operates. And I think. You know, from an artist's perspective, but also from a curator's perspective, from a director's perspective, and that is so valuable. But the other thing that I think most people probably don't know about. Well, they might know about you if they visit your website, but like you are a registered coach. You've actually done training for that. And I feel like I can hear that and what you're talking about, because the way that you talk about like task management feels. Very much like you understand the principles of learning design, for example, and I'm wondering if you could talk a little bit about. What going down that path gave you, like, how does that distinguish you?  

Paddy: Cause there are a lot of coaches out there, but we are, we are not all created equal. And what does that, what did that education do that, that helped you?  

Ceri: Yeah. Thank you for the question. Thanks for kind words, buddy. I guess what I realized after that time working in the private sector, which I'm very happy to speak a bit more about that work at Simon Lee gallery Selling artists work as well as, you know, doing art fairs and writing and doing publishing works, I guess what I learned when I, I was mentoring when I closed, I had my own commercial gallery and I closed it in 2014. And whilst I figured out what I was going to do next, I mentored around 180 artists. And so, this time around, when I left my job as Director of Programmes at Somerset House, where, that was an institution at the heart of London, and we had about two and a half million visitors. I was responsible for all the exhibitions, the gigs in the courtyard, the skating rink for my sins, and the learning and skills program. And when COVID hit, um, Black Lives Matter and everything and the world turned upside down, I decided I was, I'd intended to leave that role and I was going to take up another post, but I decided instead to really think long and hard about what it was I wanted to do, who I wanted to add value to. And so instead of thinking about other politicians, if you like, which is when you become director of institutions, you become a kind of glorified politician in some ways. And whilst I can do that, and I love helping people to think bigger and make big things happen. I also really, artists are my people, you know, like really, I get the most joy from helping artists to do more than they thought was capable.  

Ceri: And part of that I realized I could support artistry mentoring, but what I've come to know is that giving someone a roadmap is fine. And saying, I took this direction, it worked for me, or I took this direction and it worked for other people I've worked with is one thing. But really the mindset that is required to be an artist is the thing that we don't get trained. We don't get to art school or if we didn't go to art school, really the emotional rollercoaster of the journey that artists need to go through in order to make great work, it's really challenging. And we've also been sold this bullshit that, you know, we're, Uh, individuals and that we have to be individual geniuses, which I don't personally buy into, but I think that's put a lot of pressure on artists to think that they have to figure this shit out on their own. And so my understanding after mentoring even more artists in 2020 was that actually, unless I go back and actually help artists to really understand how to manage their thoughts differently, how to really get under the bonnet. of their brains, if you like, so that they can actually get their own engine in order, so that they've got the The kind of the know how and the understanding of how to manage those pesky thoughts when they go awry or how to bounce back quicker and be more resilient.  

Ceri: Um, then actually I would just be setting them up to always be dependent. the next mentor, the next mentor. So I took all my years of mentoring experience and I, I went back to train as a coach so that I could understand how to help people see their own thoughts and the old stories that were standing in the way. So any of that early rewiring that needed or that rewiring that needed to be done that comes from kind of where we grow up, how we grow up, what conditions we grew up in, who we grew up with, all of those early patterns really can set us up for either success or failure, if you like, in so many words. And actually, it's so much easier than we think to, because of neuroplasticity and neuroscience, we can actually retrain and rewire some of our thoughts so that they are in better service to us, so that we can overcome those fears. We can do the hard stuff. We can have conversations with people that we never thought we'd be able to have conversations with. We can walk into a room and introduce ourselves. Things that frighten a lot of artists that I work with, you know, that even artists working at really significantly high levels. We say, I have this term in business, another level, another devil. And usually, you know, the, the different levels of, you know, Uh, learning and development you go through as an artist just generates different kinds of fears, different kinds of anxieties and so if I could help people to really understand their own psychological map, if you like, their own patterns that might thwart them. then really, I was going to enable them to see what more was possible, if they could conquer some of those thoughts, if they could find systems to kind of, in a way, dismantle some of the more negative bias, because we are, after all, wired for a negative bias. And as artists, because we're so sensitive to the world around us, we are often more wired, more acutely in tune with a negative bias in all kinds of ways. And so it felt like the most useful thing that I could do. So I have since invested thousands padding in my own training as a coach in getting qualified.  

Ceri: And I'm actually now at master, um, coach.I just have to take my final exam. Um, uh, because that means doing thousands and thousands and thousands of hours worth of coaching with all people at different levels, different places in the world. Um, but also you get observed, you have to work with other coaches, you get trained by people who are much more senior level than me. And so you actually have to pass an exam if you like. And so to be part of an international coaching federation, um, qualified coach, you have to pass different stages of, um, exams. And so I think the one thing that I would say, the reason I know it's made an impact is because it's also helped me as a, I'm not from a wealthy background. I had to really train myself differently so that I could come to terms with how to help artists make money. I had to change my own stories about how I related to money, how I could add value to people and to help them add value. to the world. So I had to go through lots of those experiences myself, but also understand what else, what other work I needed to do.  

Ceri: So you have lots of psychological training as well as, um, the practice that it takes. And I think in a very short space of time, I've learned, um, that actually really being able to see the patterns of your own thinking helps us to become better negotiators, not just in our creative careers, but in our home life with our partners, with our kids. It's negotiating in the workplace, but also to help other people. So pretty much everyone that I coach, I would say, is lifting other people behind them. And I think that's part of the generous reciprocal kind of artwork that I want to be part of, that I knew, I know that's where you exist too, Paddy, which is why we've connected on so many levels.  

Paddy: Yeah. So when you talk about the, uh, training that you've done, it sounds like part of the training allows you to recognize patterns and then be able to say, okay, like, this is a pattern it's actually consistent with a certain stage, like certain career stage, and these are the things that we can do to get beyond These patterns so that we can move past this stage. Is that, am I summarizing correctly?  

Ceri: Yeah, that's right. There's, I guess, lots of people who would say that there's connections or similarities to therapy, but it's not therapy. I have to be really honest. There is a definite difference between therapy and coaching. Coaching is really future facing, but with an understanding of what systems or structures or thought patterns or belief systems might have been established. So when you go into a relationship with a coach, they are in a safe space together. I usually call it, it's a brave space where somebody shares the challenges that they are trying to overcome. Whether that's, you know, developing, um, a new body of work from a museum or earning an income for their work. And you start looking at those challenges and in the coaching space, you act as independent, I guess, observers of the thoughts that the client is sharing with you. And together, you're looking at those thoughts and seeing how useful they are to you and whether they could be replaced by other thoughts that serve you better.  

Ceri: So you have a look at what's standing in the way, and there are models, there are coaching models that I can draw on. Some people might be familiar with the GROW framework, uh, probably for this podcast. Um, I'd be very happy to share more if anyone is interested. Um, but there are a number of different models, and each coach basically takes out the tools in order to help somebody understand what might serve them better. So you might have a practical exercise. You might have a, so we might do something together online or in real life. We might, um, have a walking, practice, we might have a writing practice together, but there are ways of basically deconstructing some of the thoughts and actions that you've been applying, but that really could be put to better use. So in the coaching training, you are You are learning those different models and systems. You have to do a hell of a lot of reading on other coaches, but therapists and, um, understand what models might serve your particular client base. Now, I'm quite unusual in that I'm a coach who's serving artists and creative leaders at certain levels.  

Ceri: So I work with high level thinkers who are really adept at putting their thoughts to work in creating work. And actually a lot of the creative tools that they use in their practice or their creative work, jobs, if you like, very often haven't been mobilized when it comes to their own way of behaving or their own way of perceiving themselves. So for example, I might work with some leaders who are senior level leaders, but still have that imposter syndrome, still, still have a fear of negotiating at a high level. I might work with a, an artist or a comedian or a writer, for example, who has already achieved a lot but has a creative block that actually isn't connected to where they thought they were, they were going to be in their career. You know, there's some old stories that are standing in the way of them achieving what they want to achieve. So I think in that process of discovery together, it usually, to be honest, I've got to the point where it can take between four to six sessions to make significant life changing change, but actually the coaching process, you know, people have worked, have incredible discoveries after even just 15 minutes in some of those sort of the coaching containers that I work with, because just we haven't had that time afforded where somebody is paying love and respect and deep, deep listening to understand what's a play for somebody.  

Ceri: And so when you're coaching, you're observing. The whole body, you're observing what's being said, what's not being said, the way the body is talking to you, the way somebody looks up to the side, the way they articulate themselves, the words they use, and you're really noticing the gaps and reflecting back to somebody and saying, You know that you notice this and there's no judgment at all, but just saying, this is curious, you know, I noticed these patterns in the way that you're observing this thing about yourself. Is that true? Are these things really, where is the evidence for these things? And so you're unpacking together, um, really those systems that might be in place and actually it's very rare that we've had somebody pay that close attention to us. And so it's, uh, it's incredible what happens. And I think mostly I would say that I've had, I'm lucky Paddy and I've had a hundred percent success rate so far with the people that I've worked with.  

Ceri: But coaching is not for everybody. Some people aren't coachable because of the way their brains work, you know, but I work with a lot of neurodivergent creatives because it's such a high percentage of the people that's their superpower in the art world. And so the way their brains work. It takes a very particular kind of coaching in order to make that useful exercise for them. I hope that makes sense.  

Paddy: Now, do you, um, screen clients in any way or, because you've had a hundred percent success rate and you just said that some people aren't coachable. Is there anybody that you would then say, okay, like I've taken a look at your profile or whatever. I don't think you're coachable. Or is it something different?  

Ceri: I perhaps wouldn't, I perhaps wouldn't articulate it in quite that way. Um, but I would, um, I might say that it's fine. I think in all fairness, I think evil only is good as the process allows. So somebody, when you are being coached, there is radical candor and somebody has to be ready to have that honesty and to be in a place where they can accept feedback. And that's not feedback as there's no criticism or judgment in place. But in all honesty, you know, sometimes we're at a point in our lives where actually it might feel too raw or too painful. We're going through something like death or loss or, you know, a divorce. We're actually, we're a little fragile or a little more defensive necessarily to get through a particular phase in our life. So it might not be the right time. And I think in the chemistry call or discovery call that I, myself and my, um, client, my, sorry, my team would have, it's really understanding in that moment kind of where somebody's at and what they need. And, might be that actually just one of our courses or one of our group coaching containers might be better for where they're at and what they need. And that might be a better introduction in terms of this kind of deeper, it's a, it's a relationship where you are both facilitating the growth of the clients.  

Ceri: And if I'm in, then I'm a hundred percent in, you know, and so really that commitment to getting some new results. If I. If I don't believe that I can help them get a result for whatever reason they're presenting, or I get a sense that I'm not their person, I might recommend somebody else, you know, I might say, actually, I don't think I'm for you, you know, it might be that one of my associates because I have associate coaches that I work with. I'd recommend. And so I'm lucky that I've most, I've matched people with other coaches that I work with. If I don't think we're a good match, because I also have to be honest, I want to help everybody, but I'm only one human. It's not possible. And so over the last four years, I've also helped a lot of associate coaches build their businesses and, you know, help a lot of people. And so part of the mission was really just to share the love, you know, I'm not here to just kind of, um, Hulk everybody. But also, you know, I think we have to be honest ourselves. You know, I like art. I like ambitious people who may be on the tipping point of something exciting and great and who are happy and okay with being weird. That's my thing. I like, I like encouraging people to be more weird. That's my thing. You know, I'm not here to round anybody's edges off. Quite, quite the opposite.  

Paddy: I mean, I had to explain to somebody who is outside of the art world recently, that weird was a compliment inside this work, inside this, this world, I think one of the things that I was thinking about as you were talking about the work that you do, uh, is that there, at least in the US and I think outside of the U S as well, like coaches really, uh, the term is applied sort of willy nilly and I think coach can mean a consultant, you know, like an artist consultant that comes in and gives feedback on X, Y, Z thing. Um, and then there's something that's, uh, that you're talking about. That's more like extended work between, you know, four and six sessions where you're sort of diving into things that on a deeper level, and I think it's really good to, um, Make that distinction, uh, because like what you're getting is, is different and it's answering different needs. I did have one question for you, and I think like this, this does have to do with also, Like the coaching that you're talking about also seems to encompass a lot of mental space, right? And so there's the work that we do that has to do with what you were talking about before about identifying a goal and then chunking the steps to get to that goal down so that you can really focus and achieve what you want to do.  

Paddy: And also sort of, I guess, like work with. More focus, right? And then there's the other part of this where you have to manage your emotions and managing your emotions is a really big part of this because a lot of the work that we do that involves growth is very scary and it's very hard to do. And a lot of times we don't make these changes until our back is up against the ladder. And we don't have any choice. And I actually think that that's normal. I think that making any kind of major change or major jump in your career, it takes an enormous amount of courage. And with that courage, I think also comes a certain amount of, um, self doubt and, uh, feeling like crap. And you had like just a little mini podcast where you talked about what you. What you did. Um, to deal with that. And you actually have like a penalty that you impose on yourself. If you start really indulging and not just like the negative self-talk, but the like, uh, you know, I'm feeling like shit today, I'm just going to like scroll through Instagram. Spend a hundred hours on TV. Well, there's only 24 hours in a day, but you know, whatever it is that you need to do to kind of, I'm feeling bad and I'm going to make myself feel worse because that's, I don't know if the internal monologue is, that's what I deserve, but it's part of just like, I'm just going to dig my heels into this.  

Ceri: Yeah.  

Ceri: It's a really, it's an interesting thing and I, the reason I use myself as an example in that Paddy is because I, We're all a work in progress, right? So I think if you have a creative brain, which let's face it, you know, that's why we're, we're both here trying to help people manage their creative brains. It's really your thoughts are your work. You know, you, you are these incredible people who, Manifest the most incredible things in the world from your thoughts. And so, you also have, as well as those incredible, brilliant thoughts that make great paintings or sculpture or VR works, you also have thoughts that occasionally are cruel and mean and, you know, preferably kick the shit out of yourself. And I am no different. And so, um, Going back to that time that you talked about where people say how do, how do I make the time when I've got a family, I've got kids, I've got a day job, you know, how do I make time? And then when I really dig into it, you know, people have actually looked at their scroll time on their phone and they've actually killed four hours, doom scrolling on their phone. And you know, I'm doing exactly the same, or I have done exactly the same, where I'm like, actually, I'm procrastinating, I'm putting off doing the thing. I don't know if you know the phrase, eating the frog, Paddy, you know, where, you know, you're putting off doing like, so it's like basically where if you were being sensible, you would eat the frog, let's do the shittiest, hardest thing first in your day, before you do all the other things.  

Ceri: Because once you've done that you get your dopamine hit, you overcome your fear, and you get over your procrastination. You know, but there are days, of course, when I would rather doomscroll or watch RuPaul's Drag Race than actually write that newsletter or write an article. I think that idea that actually knowing and being honest and vulnerable with each other, and I've, I've had to practice being more vulnerable with people publicly. I And because, you know, I'm, as I said, I'm a shy person, it's not a natural state for me, but I've learned that only the world opens up the more vulnerable I'm prepared to be, within reason, of course, and the more honest I am at saying, actually, you know what, some days my brain just literally thinks that I'm a piece of useless shit, and I should hide under the duvet, you know, so, But what I've done is learn how to manage that emotional rollercoaster better so that I recognize it and I can feel the feelings. You know, I can feel the feelings and that they don't flood my engine to the point of immobilization. So I try to give myself a worry window. You know, like if I get that shit email from somebody, or, um, something doesn't go as planned, I give myself a 10 minute worry window, where I indulge those thoughts, like, ooh, God, whatever, you know? And then I'm just like, yeah, whatever. Whatever! It's, you know, it's part of being a creative person. I'm used to, and I deliberately try to get a hundred no's as often as possible. You know? I just have to be willing to get a hundred no's and then one great thing is going to happen. And so, by practicing these techniques and helping others, to practice these techniques.  

Ceri: I decided I was going to give myself, I was going to make a crap manifesto, which as we quite rightly say, I read out on my mini podcast. And I recommend everyone has a crap manifesto, because if you think that you'd get out of this creative journey without feeling like a pile of shit some days, then you've got another thing coming. We all do. But it's whether or not feeling like that is stuck in some pattern where it feels more comfortable to give yourself an internal kicking than it does to eat the frog and do the tougher thing. Because the reality is our brain is wired for efficiency and pleasure. So its main job is to keep you safe and to stop bad things from happening to you. So if you know that your brain is wired for a negative bias, every single day it is going to give you some negative thoughts. It's just, that's the way it is, and if you're creative you're going to get a whole heap more negative thoughts than your average person.  

Ceri: So, I have some techniques, and one of the things I had to do this morning was just journal. As soon as I got out of bed, because I woke up, I just came back from a week's holiday paddy, the first holiday I've had in four years. And would you believe, I had the most wonderful time, and yet I woke up this morning, feeling rubbish. How does that work? Do you know, my brain just went into doing its thing, which is like, Oh, man. So before I could even put on, put on the emails, look at my phone, my instinct, I had to override them and say, no, I'm just going to journal. So I spent 45 minutes getting all of the crap out of my brain so that I could actually get on with my day. And then have a wonderful thing like this to look forward to, to share with you. So I think it's just knowing that there are simple techniques and tools that you can learn that help you to manage those emotions. And that is part of your job. If you are a creative person, it is part of your job to not just roll over and give in to the black dog or any of those difficult, um, feelings and experiences, because that is an indulgence that you can't afford to, you can't afford to stoke that fire for too long, because you're going to usurp your creativity. And really, as a creative, you've got one of the best gifts in the world.  

Ceri: You know, you add value to people in the most incredible way. And so, you know, our job's really back to is to help people. You know, clear the weeds from the path so they can keep adding amazing, brilliant things to the world. And that means just allowing yourself to get help. Ask for help. There is absolutely no reason why you should struggle on your own and that idea that you can and you should is absolutely bullshit. How do you think all of the wealthy people in the world become wealthy? Because they ask for help and they get it. Build networks. They ask on a regular basis. And they are  

Paddy: I think that is something that is built into the class consciousness at that level. Like they're used to telling people to do work for them. They're used to getting help. I think that's something that we all have to get used to as well.  

Ceri: Yeah, a hundred percent, which is why most of the people that I would invite onto my podcast, and I know you too, Paddy, they're people who don't come from wealthy backgrounds. They're people who have just figured stuff out the hard way, and they're willing to share their expertise and knowledge. And there are lots of us out there like that. So, yeah, my key message is don't struggle alone. You know, there are systems and constructed things in the world, and That there are people out there who are willing to demystify and help you understand so that you don't have to keep bashing your head against a brick wall and, uh, hoping it'll work out okay. You know, the main thing is just identify what you want and learn the skills and the tools and the mindset that is required to actually make it happen. Because it is possible, for not just for us, but for everybody. So, yeah, we're on a mission to help people.  

Paddy: Ceri, that is amazing. And I think actually that's a perfect note to end on. I want to thank you so much for coming on this show. I feel like this was an hour of just. pure illumination. And I cannot wait to talk to you online. Everybody who wants to know more about you, where should they go?  

Ceri: Thank you, Paddy. Um, so at Ceri, which is C E R I, which is actually a Welsh spelling is Ceri Hand, H A N D dot com. (cerihand.com) You'll find ways, there are free resources on there, like how to work with commercial galleries, how to have studio visits. I do affordable, short masterclasses, we've got one coming up soon, on studio visits, but also how to, uh, work with commissioners, and we also have our course, Unlock Your Artwork Network.  

Ceri: So hopefully there's enough there, but we also have a free newsletter where I speak the block is my weekly coaching advice, and that's free. So people can just subscribe and sign up and get discounts to things too. Oh, and follow @cerihand on socials.  

Paddy: Ah, there you go. All right. Thanks so much, Ceri. Bye bye.  

 

Paddy  

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] Art Problems: Four Mistakes People Make When Working with An Accountant

In honor of the upcoming quarterly tax payments, I’m sharing an episode from Sunlight, my favorite podcast about taxes, money, and managing your art career.

About this episode, podcast host, artist, and accountant Hannah Cole writes, 

Have you ever wondered what questions you should ask when you’re hiring a new accountant?

Today, I’m explaining some of the biggest mistakes I see people make when they begin to work with an accountant and clarifying what you don’t get when hiring an accountant. 

Listen to today’s episode to learn how working with an accountant could work for your small business, some of the benefits, and how you can make sure you pick the right one for you. 

Also mentioned in today’s episode: 

  • The disconnect between art and business 

  • Learning about new tax credits 

  • How to know which questions you should ask your new accountant 

  • Estimated quarterly taxes and why they are so important

Listen to the podcast here!

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] Art Problems: Is Having Your Face Sat On Beautiful?

Left, Paddy Johnson. Right, Bianca Bosker

I asked that question of Get the Picture author Bianca Bosker on this week's episode of Art Problems.

And let me tell you, the answer was every bit as thrilling as asking the question.

In Bosker's New York Times bestselling book, she spends five years working at galleries, and artist studios, as well as interviewing the Whitney Biennial curators and spending time working as a guard at museums, all to better understand how to appreciate art.

In our interview, we dig a little deeper into the themes of the book, and try to get to the bottom of questions like,

Why does art matter?

Why is the art world so mysterious?

How does a person look at or evaluate art?

Tune in, because this is a podcast you will not want to miss!

Relevant links:

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/156741696-get-the-picture

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] Art Problems: Emerging Art Sales Return

Shaun Pierson

Untitled (Self-Portrait), 2023

Archival pigment print in white frame

20 x 15 inches

You know how every other headline for the past year has been about the sinking art market? Well, we're finally starting to see the light.

In this week's episode of the Art Problems podcast, I discuss two fairs and an art show in Chelsea and how art sales are finally on the rise!

Relevant links: Join the Netvvrk membership


READ THE EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

Podcast Episode 58: 

 

You’re listening to the Art Problems Podcast episode 58.  

I’m your host Paddy Johnson.  

This is the podcast where we talk about how to get more shows, grants, and residencies.  

And before I start this podcast, I want to let you know that the Netvvrk membership is open through Sunday. If you are thinking about joining, let me give you a nudge, because we’re about to make some major upgrades to the membership that will increase the price. And if you’ve been listening to the podcast for a while, you’ve probably been getting that sense. With the artist William Powhida we’ve done some extensive work breaking down an artist’s path to success. And between that and some major other updates that I’ve got to keep close to my chest for now, you’re just gonna get an insane amount of value for what you pay.  

After I finish these upgrades, I’m thinking my next major project might be a book. For years, I’ve wanted to do this, but didn’t feel I had the right subject. But now, I think I do.  

Anyway, today I want to talk about what I saw last week in New York; Nada, Future, and TipToeing Through the Kitchen, a show of recent photography at Luhring Augustine.  

Let’s start with some overall impressions:  

Based on my conversations with dealers at NADA and Future Fair, I’d say selling went a whole lot better this year. This is very good news if you’re an emerging artist who wants to sell their work because the market has been really depressed for a while.  

Now, I’ll offer the disclaimer that in the art world we don’t have a lot of reliable measures of how galleries are doing. You just have to rely on what your friends tell you and an overall vibe. In this case several artists and dealers told me they had made their money back and then some. And in terms of vibe, I wasn’t being kept at booths for unusually long periods of time - usually a sign of struggle on the part of dealers who haven’t made sales and desperately need them. But also, people seemed generally more relaxed and happy.  

Overall, the quality of the booth at Future Fair felt a little less exciting than usual, but Red Arrow Gallery from Nashville showed the paintings of Karen Seapker - surrealist type abstractions in pastels that allude to the body, relationships, and the landscape. A theme of renewal seemed to come through to me, and the paintings were expertly executed, so a pleasure to look at.  

Becky Brown’s paintings sold so well at Good Naked that several rehangings had to take place, but a split lettering arrangement that read committee on hand and community on the other made me laugh.  

You never know what'll happen. All right, so contradiction number two. Here's your brand versus just do your thing and it'll look like you. So this contradiction and many that follow are the result of not understanding what part of the industry you are in. So Louise Mayhew has identified four different parts of the art world, experimental, traditional, community, and retail.  

Over at NADA, Rebecca Morgan’s painting of a nude painter covered in paint that looks like sexual juice at Aysa Giesberg made me laugh. Harper’s gallery showed a multicolor landscape with lemons by Joani Tremblay. I’ve been coveting those paintings for a while, but I think I’m not the only one.  

The highlight of NADA was being identified as I was leaving by artist Patrick Carlin Mohundro and brought back in to see his booth at Essex Flowers. I want to mention this because I didn’t already know Patrick, so I assume it took a bit of courage not just to say something to me but ask me if I’d seen his booth. But we had a lot to talk about - he had his own work on view, and taught professional practices. And that’s where I think being aware of what other people do, and just in general, the contemporary art discourse, gives you an edge. You always have something to talk about.  

And can I tell you - I was so glad I went back to see his booth! In it, he showed several porcelain pieces he’d cast using canvas, and stitched together with stained glass. The works resemble horizoned landscapes and most had sold - another artist victory.  

The last show I want to mention is TipToeing Through the Kitchen, a show of recent photography at Luhring Augustine. This was a group show featuring the work of seven artists organized around the theme of kinship and cultural inheritance.  

Not an art fair, but I bring it up for a couple of reasons:  

1. I feel like it’s been forever since I’ve seen a photography show of emerging art. So, it was great to see this.  

2. Some of the work was well under $5000 which is so rare to see in a Chelsea gallery, so I was super excited to see a gallery take a risk like this.  

Finally two artists’ work stood out to me Brittany Nelson, and Shaun Pierson.

Nelson’s spare and abstract black and white photographs suggest isolation and seem tinged with sadness. For me the virtuosity of these photographs lies in the ability to imbue images that are sometimes almost entirely abstract with such intense emotion. You feel the isolation. Nelson is something of a photography nerd, so some of the photographs are made with specialized processing techniques.  

Shaun Pierson’s homoerotic work looks at the relationship between photographer and subject. A lot of the shots have a behind the scenes feel - setting up staging for a thing that is about to happen, but the stage itself is the subject. A self portrait, shot naked with his back to us, curled in a fetal position, stands out because his figure resembles little more than a lump of flesh or a plucked turkey. Though I also enjoyed what I will refer to as several uncanny “dick just out of site” shots. I call them that because the dicks are just out of site. They’re playful, but with an edge – there’s something purposely impoverished about the scenes. It’s a nice break from the general aesthetic of lavishness that seems to be taking over the fairs.  

So it was a great palette cleanser, and just what I needed!  

Alright, that’s it for today.  

Again a reminder if you’re thinking about signing up for Netvvrk you have until Sunday and let me just say this: I’d love to work with you!  

Sign up link in the show notes!  

Paddy  

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] Art Problems: Build Your Confidence in Two Easy Steps

You know what sucks? Feeling like you've been stuck in the same place career-wise for years on end, with no solution insight.

You're tired.

And you're demoralized.

What if I told you I could give you a way to feel better, even if for just a short while?

Well, I've got you.

In this podcast I give you two easy exercises that will help build your confidence AND ease feelings of burn out.

I can't wait to hear what you think!

Relevant links:

My free Masterclass, How to Get Seen in the Art World Without the Burnout, taking place this Tuesday, May 7th, at 7:30 PM EST

Interview with Ann Rosen https://www.instagram.com/p/C6eR6X6L-tN/

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] ART PROBLEMS: The 10 Most Common Art World Contradictions

Doesn't the art world drive you nuts?

There are all these rules of conduct you're supposed to follow, but then you're also supposed to know all the times when those rules don't apply. It's like you need the equivalent of a degree in engineering, just to get your foot in the door. (In reality, that degree is probably more like an MFA from Yale.)


Well, today I break down the 10 most common contradictions and give you an advanced guide on how to navigate them.


You'll recognize that the art world's secrets aren't secrets, so much as confusion due to a lack of clear definitions.


And you'll be able to navigate the world more easily towards greater success.


Which is exactly what we want.

Listen to the latest episode of Art Problems Podcast Here

READ THE EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

Podcast Episode 55: 

 

 You're listening to the Art Problems Podcast, Episode 55. I'm your host, Paddy Johnson. This is a podcast where we talk about how to get more shows, grants, and residencies. And today on the podcast, we're talking about art world contradictions. This podcast is inspired by an Instagram post I produced earlier this week about art world norms and the contradictions that accompany those norms.  

And a large number Of the comments below that post identifying, you know, the hundreds more contradictions that there actually are because there are so many and there were also a number of frustrated comments over the fact that there didn't seem to be anything to be done to make it easier for artists.  

So I thought, here's what I can do. I'm going to take the 10 most common answers and offer some guidance on each. so much. So let's get into it. Contradiction number one, be humble. Don't approach gallerists versus be self promoting and get gallery representation. So be humble and don't approach gallerists that that first bit of advice is likely the result of galleries being bombarded by blind solicitations by artists who have done no research.  

And they would like those solicitations to stop. Another version of this is no blind DMs. But the average person listening to this podcast, at least, doesn't need to hear that. In fact, more likely, you're struggling with how to send that DM in the first place. And the answer to that is simple. Send DMS when you have something to say, this is how you build enough trust to get a response.  

So I'm going to give you an example of something that happened to me. So last year, I sent a blind DM to a pair of collectors who I knew were a perfect fit for the network membership. We had people in common, they had the right focus. I'd done the research. I'd never met them. They didn't know me. And, you know, I sent them a DM or two and the DM went unanswered and I didn't really think that much of it because it's Instagram.  

So people can lose track of their DMS and, you know, it's possible they weren't interested anyway. Cut to yesterday and they curated a work of art into a show that I just loved and I saw it on Instagram so I sent them a DM to say that. And what this did was it resurfaced the original ask and the timing was good for them now.  

Because they happen to be promoting a show so they can promote that show to the membership and we're going to make something happen. So the lesson here is threefold. One, do the research because if you don't do that, then the DM will never work. Two, don't be afraid to reach out once you are certain of a fit.  

And three, this is probably the most important one. Don't assume that just because you haven't heard back from a gallery, That that is an indication of a lack of interest. Just because something isn't the right time right now, doesn't mean that it will never be the right time. If you have something to say about the work that somebody else is doing, let them know.  

You never know what'll happen. All right, so contradiction number two. Here's your brand versus just do your thing and it'll look like you. So this contradiction and many that follow are the result of not understanding what part of the industry you are in. So Louise Mayhew has identified four different parts of the art world, experimental, traditional, community, and retail.  

So if you're in the experimental section, you're making work that Critically engages with your field. If you are in the traditional world, you're making work for exhibiting and selling to art collectors. If you're in the community world, you're facilitating art making for participants. And if you're in the retail world, you're making art for selling to everyday buyers and you are looking to grow your audience for the purpose of selling, right?  

If you're a retail artist, you are not conflicted by commerce, or at least you're less conflicted by it. Let's compare that to traditional artists. Traditional artists have been making work for a while. Commercial galleries Often talk about concepts of quote unquote newness and seek out perspectives that seem very unique to the artist. So your brand isn't built off appealing to hundreds of thousands of people. You only need to connect with a handful. But they do need to be rich.  

So your marketing is going to look completely different. You don't need to reach the same mass audience that an influencer or retail artist does. So that is what feels like a contradiction between just doing your thing and here's your brand. Because just do your thing and it'll look like you are really more appropriate for the traditional art world.  

And here's your brand and let's build that is more appropriate for the retail world.  

The third contradiction, money shouldn't impact your work. Just make What sells? This contradiction reveals the same market split that I was talking about in the previous contradiction. Money shouldn't impact your work, which is at the lower end of the traditional or contemporary art market, versus just making what sells, which is more appropriate for the retail market.  

It's worth noting though, that at the higher end of the market, there's a higher cost to making work that doesn't sell. So you think about it more. Cicely Brown, for example, has talked about how difficult it is to destroy paintings that aren't working because she knows she's destroying something that's worth six or seven figures.  

Ellsworth Kelly flower drawing prints are pretty and they sell. So he Several series of these, some in the 60s, some in the 80s. I mean, why not, right? They sell. Theaster Gates used firehose paintings and sculptures to fund his community projects. So there are a lot of reasons that people will make things just to sell or will be more conscious of it than others.  

And a lot of that has to do with goals and class behaviors. Another version of this, is marketing your work to customers the same way you would any other commodity versus maintaining the impression that you're only in this for the intellectual and spiritual purpose of art. Or don't sell your work on your website if you want to attract galleries versus sell your work on the website and cut out the middleman.  

Each of these connects knowing where your audience is and your place in the market. They're not true contradictions. In other words, they're just differences of how you identify your audience and what you need to do to meet that audience. So the fourth contradiction is technical mastery versus technique doesn't matter.  

Again, this is one of those things that falls into a category of where you're situated in the art industry. Though this time, the distinction is more between the experimental world, which looks more like nonprofits, artist spaces, and some museums, and the traditional art world, where you're showing at commercial galleries, and more often than not, technical mastery does matter.  

Now, does it always matter? No. Mauricio Catalan's Banana is a good example of that. That was an edition piece that was taped, a banana taped to the wall, which debuted at Art Basel, Miami that cost 150, 000 each. It was an edition, it was an edition of five. This conflict has no resolution except to say that context matters.  

If the same piece, the same banana and duct tape appeared in a secondhand store, it would sell for a dollar if you were lucky, right? It's at Art Basel Miami and it's a piece by Mauricio Catalan and it costs something different. All right. So number five, you don't need An MFA versus we only look at you if you have an MFA.  

Again, if you're in the world of retail, your MFA is not going to mean that much. So you don't need to worry about it. In the traditional world, it does. It's literally the first line on your CV. That said, a long show history makes an MFA less relevant. So it's possible to get that. And I want to mention it here.  

This leads into a second contradiction, which is that we support diversity and inclusivity in this program versus 50 percent of the recipients who went to one of these three programs. In the art world, diversity does not include class. Now, I think we can shift some of this through the strength of our networks that we build, but that's going to take a while.  

And so as far as I can tell, this contradiction is going to be with us for more time than I would like. Contradiction number six, galleries want to see strong sales records before showing you. You need to show to build up sales. This is generally a contradiction felt most acutely by artists who don't feel a great sense of agency over what happens to their work outside of the studio.  

And it does have a chicken and egg feel to it, but there is a path to follow here. And it's actually something that we're introducing inside Network for the next cohort, um, who's joining us. And, uh, if you're already a member, of course you get the upgrade automatically. So just know that that's coming, but that often involves.  

Self organizing shows and not working until you know enough people for inclusion in a group show. Now, obviously, there's a lot of steps in between that we don't really have time to get into in this podcast, but those are the broad strokes. The number 7. The seventh contradiction, just use an iPhone to photograph your work versus you need to use a good expensive camera and equipment and know how to use it.  

I think this one is a legitimate contradiction but I do have a rule of thumb for you that I wanted to share and it is specifically good for painters and people who are making wall mounted work. If you are shooting wall mounted work in a studio and you have good lighting and a decent phone, you can shoot individual works with an iPhone.  

It doesn't take that much effort or skill. All of that said, I would never recommend shooting an installation without a professional. Your documentation matters a lot. Way more than most of us think. So if you have an installation, if you have a show, make sure no matter what you do, that you get professional photos of that, because it's really going to make a difference to your career, contradiction number eight, don't list prices on social posts, list prices on social posts only.  

Again, here, context matters. If you're trying to make room in a flat file so that you can fit more in, you might run a fire sale on Instagram to get rid of that stuff, right? And that's fine. If you're doing that, you've got to list the prices. It's not going to be invisible. By contrast, if you're looking for a commercial gallery to represent your work, you're not going to list the sale price on Instagram because your goal is to get somebody else to sell it, right?  

And this is one of the reasons that we spend so much time with artists helping them identify their goals, because what it does is it helps you make sound decisions. And we can see that in this contradiction. Contradiction number nine. Make sure your work fits into the program of the gallery before you approach them, meaning there is a shared aesthetic language versus this is too much like what we already show.  

So we can't show you. I love this one as a contradiction because the truth is sometimes there's an outsider to the program. We can't tell what will represent too much of a similarity to a dealer. And the only way to know is to have more conversations. I'm not sure that eliminates the original contradiction, but it does give you a path forward to eliminate it.  

Finally, contradiction number 10, it takes time to develop a mature practice and body of work versus we love the young, sexy ones. This is, this is a very, very good contradiction in the sense that, uh, it exists. This contradiction reveals the disconnect between the quality of our work and The market demands, which are often shaped by networks and a desire to get some sort of return on investment.  

And the fact is the chances of a return on your investment are greater with younger artists. Here's the thing though, if you're looking to buy the artist's best work, I almost always advise purchasing that as they get older, because experience matters. As you make more work, your art will get better.  

All right, that's all the contradictions for today.  

I'm sure there's a lot more of them, but those were the core ones.  

I'll see you next week when I interview the author of the artwork, Heather Darcy Bundary.  

 

Paddy  

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] ART PROBLEMS: You're More Than a Label

One of the great frustrations with the art world is the nonsense terms you have to interpret and apply to your practice. Are you an emerging, mid-career, or an established artist? NOBODY KNOWS. It's different for every application you fill out.

What if I told you, I had a solution to this problem?

A set of terms where you could easily see your EXACT place within the art world.

Well, whatyaknow! That's the subject of this podcast!

You'll learn the terms and industry sectors we're identifying behind the scenes at Netvvrk and how to apply them to your practice.

Tune in, and as always let me know what you think on Instagram. I want to hear your thoughts!

READ THE EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

Podcast Episode 53: 

 

You’re listening to the art problems podcast, Episode 53. This is the podcast where we talk about how to get more shows, grants, and residencies.  

And on this podcast I’m going to let listeners in on some of the work I’ve been doing behind the scenes with the artist William Powhida rebuilding our curriculum. Why are we doing this? Well, we wanted to lay out a path that every artist, no matter where they are in their career can follow, so that they get more visibility.  

Now, this may sound, well, impossible, because every artist has strengths and weaknesses and is in a different spot in their career. And that’s not wrong. It’s one of the reasons we’ve been so careful when laying this program out. I still fundamentally believe that every artist’s path is different.  

But with that said, I also know there are certain decisions that you need to have made, and materials in place, in order for any progress to be made. So, today, I’m going to lay out the plan we’re mapping for the artists inside of Netvvrk, so that if you’re a member, you know what we’re working on behind the scenes and can start using our resources to implement these things even before we release the program, and if you’re not, you have a sense of what you need to do!  

I’m going to begin, though, by walking you through the sectors and tiers we’ve established for the art industry and artists. Because if there’s one thing we can agree on, it’s that emerging, mid-career, and established, doesn’t mean ANYTHING. And as an artist, it’s really helpful for you to know exactly where in the industry you’re participating in and at level.  

Let’s dive in on the tiers. We use four basic categories, beginning, intermediate, proficient, and master. But to these categories, we also apply reach, which starts at regional, graduates to national, and then global. So, for example, you might be a master regional artist, but a beginner or intermediate national artist. And these distinctions can easily be read by someone with a high degree of literacy in the art world, just by looking at a CV, but might not be immediately apparent to you. And the reason knowing these distinctions is important, is because knowing where you start, allows you to set realistic goals on where you want to go.  

But we also want to add to this, the sectors of the industry you participate in. And for a lot of artists this will be more than one. So let’s go through those.  

SECTOR EXAMPLE
Amateur/Hobbyist Coffee Shops
Non-profit, Academic Brandeis, NYU, Montclair, The Hammer
Non-profit, Museums and Art Centers Smack Mellon, MCA Chicago, etc
Public Art Percent for Art, Black Cube, CO
Direct to customer Saatchi, Etsy, etc
Corporate Clients Hospitals, Hotels, Credit Card companies
Commercial Primary Market Night Gallery, LA, Spinello Projects FL
Alternative Spaces Tiger Strikes Asteroid, Plug Projects
 

If we’ve missed any I’d love to hear from you, but those represent the broad sectors we see most in and outside of the membership.  

Once you know which part of the industry you mostly work within, you can set up your web presence in a way that responds to that sector. For example, If you sell your work directly to clients, your website is going to be set up entirely differently then if you sell your work through galleries. And you need to know your audience in order to design your website for them.  

And this is why, I always recommend artists start by identifying which industry sectors they participate in, who their audience is, and then orient their website to those audiences. If you don’t do this, you will not be able to make headway in the art world. And that’s because you’ll be creating a website for an imagined audience rather than the one you have.  

Now, I’m going to walk you through a beginner pathway we’ve laid out, and even if that’s not you, let’s say you’re a master regional artist - this will be helpful, because you’re likely making a lot of decisions based on knowledge you have but don’t even recognize. And hearing it codified makes repeating and building on your successes a lot easier.  

The tiers and sectors I just laid out appear in the foundations, but we will ask you to reflect on your art. Because none of this works without your art.  

Once your foundations are complete, we start with your website, which is the first representation of your work that you can control. And all the areas where YOU control the representation of your work is where we want you to focus. Your work, your bio, your artist statement, it all lives on the website. But the website is an island – essentially useless without any of the tools you might use to get someone there. These are tools like Instagram, business cards, networking events, mailing lists, and this is why we refer to the development of these tools as a communication eco-system. It’s a pool that constantly needs to have its PH levels balanced, so flow occurs easily.  

Artists who sell lower priced items on their website will need pricing guidance, so that’s the next module in our curriculum, followed by Instagram, and Networking which helps you get people to the site but also encourages soliciting feedback.  

Now, one problem I see artists struggle with a lot is applying critical rigor to their work and others. I want to acknowledge that this criticality comes easier to some types of work than to others; an intuitive painter communicating feelings through abstraction may not maintain a conceptual practice or have any interest in it. But every artist needs the ability to distinguish their work from others, and that’s what criticality does for your work.  

What is criticality? There are probably a lot of definitions to this, but in my opinion, it’s less about critique of specific subjects, although that can be part of it, but rather applying context sensitivity and curiosity to all aspects of your practice. Even intuitive abstraction draws from the contemporary context. Your ability to bring specific aesthetic language to your work, and specific textual language to how you talk about it, as how you differentiate yourself.  

And I think that’s why the recent Slide Slam with the Senior Curator at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Denver Miranda Lash felt so substantial to members. Miranda spoke about every single work with depth and expertise, drawing historical references, citing themes, and then bringing the themes that emerged for in reviewing roughly 200 netvvrk members work - those included intimate portraiture, and the home, made strange. In the talk Miranda asked whether this was an after effect of covid, or a greater willingness to be vulnerable what makes our homes.  

The last stage we have in the beginner path, but can be applied more broadly, is that once you have all of these pieces in place, you start applying to shows. If you’re at the beginner level you’re likely going to be applying to open calls and member shows. But I want to discourage the idea that if you’re a more advanced artist you’re not submitting proposals. We just had John Massier, the curator of Hallways into Netvvrk to speak, and he talked about mid-career retrospective proposals he’s received, attempted to place at Institutions larger than his own, and launched himself. If you’re working at a high level, you’re still submitting proposals. It’s just a less visible process.  

Alright, that’s it for this episode!  

I’ll see you back here next week!  

 

Paddy  

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] ART PROBLEMS: Is the Economic Center of the Art World Shifting?

Frieze, LA 2024

I am back from the LA fairs, hoo boy, do I have some impressions. There was so much to do and see relative to New York’s Frieze week, that I started to wonder if New York would continue to be the economic center for art!


In this podcast I discuss the biz, trends, and art so you have all the information you need to know whether participating in the LA Fairs is worth the investment.


You’ll also get the skinny on each fair so you get a sense of the flavor of each.


By the end, you'll be armed with everything you need to navigate and succeed in the art fair environment.


Relevant links:

ART MARKET REPORTS

Artnet Frieze Los Angeles Is Smaller This Year, but Dealers Are Doing Big Business
https://news.artnet.com/market/frieze-los-angeles-is-smaller-this-year-but-dealers-are-doing-big-business-2442125

The Art Newspaper, Felix is fun as ever, even as Sales Slow
https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2024/02/29/felix-is-fun-as-ever-even-as-sales-slow

Frieze Fair, Felix and more this weekend (paywall)
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2024-02-29/frieze-los-angeles-2024-felix-art-fair

TRENDS
Heavily patterned paintings that look like rugs.


Aydee Rodriguez Lopez at Proyectos Monclova
https://www.proyectosmonclova.com/artists/aydee-rodriguez-lopez

Laura Owens at Matthew Marks
https://matthewmarks.com/artists/laura-owens

Jeff Perrone at Corbett vs Dempsey
https://corbettvsdempsey.com/exhibitions/felix-art-fair-2024/

SPRING BREAK HIGHLIGHTS

SPRING/BREAK ART SHOW
https://www.springbreakartshow.com/

Fred Fleisher curates Don Porcella
https://springbreakartfair.com/collections/spring-break-art-show-la-2024/fred-fleisher

Cheryl Molnar curates Rachelle Anayansi Mozman Solano
https://springbreakartfair.com/collections/cheryl-molnar-la-2024

Fabiola Gironi and Robert Minervini https://springbreakartfair.com/collections/spring-break-art-show-la-2024/fabiola-gironi


Mary Henderson curated by Sarah A Gamble
https://springbreakartfair.com/collections/spring-break-art-show-la-2024/mary-henderson


Michael Handley curated by Jack Henry
https://springbreakartfair.com/collections/spring-break-art-show-la-2024/michael-handley


FRIEZE HIGHLIGHTS

Frieze LA
https://www.frieze.com/tags/frieze-los-angeles-2024

Hernan Bas at Victoria Miro
https://online.victoria-miro.com/frieze-los-angeles-2024-hernan-bas/

Jordan Casteel at Casey Kaplan
https://caseykaplangallery.com/artists/casteel/

FELIX ART FAIR HIGHLIGHTS

Felix Art Fair
https://felixfair.com/

Kavi Gupta at Felix
https://kavigupta.com/events/156/overview/

Sargent’s Daughters
https://www.sargentsdaughters.com/

Michael Kirkham at Harkawik gallery https://galleryplatform.la/galleries/harkawik/exhibitions/felix-art-fair-2024


READ THE EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

Podcast Episode 51: 

 

You’re listening to the Art Problems Podcast, Episode 51. I’m your host, Paddy Johnson. This is the podcast where we talk about how to get more shows, grants and residencies.  

And on this podcast I’m going to be discussing my trip to Los Angeles for the art fairs. But I also want to seed a larger question, which developed as I visited talked to people and visited the fairs, which is: Is the economic center of the art world shifting to L.A? Let me explain how this question started to formulate and then I’ll do a deeper dive into the fairs themselves, in terms of character, trends, and notable art works.  

The first fair I visited in LA was SPRING/BREAK. SPRING/BREAK is probably best known as the fair most friendly to artists without representation. They use a curatorial model, meaning you apply with work under a theme the fair organizers chose for the fair as a whole, you work with a curator (which is usually another artist) and propose a booth often consisting of two or more artists. This year, for the first time, the fair included spotlights - solo booths for artists selected by the fair organizers. The cost of the both typically runs in the hundreds of dollars, rather than tens of thousands other fairs charge, and SPRING/BREAK makes additional funds by taking a percentage of your sales.  

The vast majority of L.A. based artists I met at the fair were New York transplants. Those who had been in LA for a while, spoke about how much bigger the scene was than ten years prior. Most discussed a need for more affordable space and better weather as a reason for moving.  

Obviously, the move has been going on for some time. But the sheer volume of New York transplants seemed notable at this point.  

The next day, I went to the Frieze Art Fair and Felix. Frieze, which is the largest fair of the three I saw in LA, and attracts the wealthiest collectors and the most expensive art felt alive and full of energy, whereas Felix - the fair for the middle market — felt subdued by contrast. I was feeling pretty under the weather, so most of my conversations about the events happened the following day when I went gallery hopping and met up with the artists inside Netvvrk. Many artists at the Netvvrk event at The Middle Room Gallery had come directly from Frieze, where crowds were so thick they could barely move.  

Prior to having talked to anyone, I came out of Frieze assuming the market was flat. Everyone brought painting, which is what you do in a cooler market because it sells better than any other medium, and the New York dealers I had spoken with earlier in the week were still complaining about the market.  

But frenzied activity the likes of Saturday’s crowd don’t occur outside of sales, and Artnet reported that sales were brisk. Five years ago, all the LA based fairs had been short lived, without a collectors market to support them.  

This stands in stark contrast to Frieze New York, which is having troubles. After three days in L.A. I concluded that if you lived here and work in the arts, you couldn’t afford to skip Frieze. Last fall, I decided not to attend Frieze New York any more because it was too expensive, I found the non-profit location offensive and depressing, and it wasn’t like I was doing Networking there I couldn’t do elsewhere. So, I felt like I could skip it. And the reason this is significant is that Frieze is one of the largest art fairs in the world. And if Frieze doesn’t do well in New York, but it does well in L.A., then that could be an issue for New York. What I don’t know is whether New York based collectors are flying to LA to purchase work they can also find in NYC. That’s the big tell. But I’m going there because I can see the need, and I know I’m not the only one.  

Meanwhile, over at Felix, I spoke with Allegra LaVoila of Sargent’s Daughters who said she felt she should take a large booth, now that she has an outpost in LA as well. Now even mid-sized galleries have locations on both coasts.  

All of these factors combined make me feel like the economic center is shifting West. Why? The real estate is cheaper, fabrication costs are lower, and there’s more space. All of these things are conditions needed for art.  

Now, due to feeling ill, I wasn’t able to talk to enough dealers about sales to really understand how Felix did - Felix did less well than Frieze. Unlike the year prior, there were no lines to get into the rooms, but for the first night. So, it seems like the excitement has died down. Felix for those who haven’t been, but are familiar with New York’s Independent Art Fair, is a very similar line up of middle market galleries only instead of showing in a glimmering white space, they take over the historic Roosevelt Hotel. It’s a kinda dingy space but some of the hotel rooms have bars in them, which I think is kinda fun.  

I’ll note here that the publishing industry is so hollowed out, that there’s almost no market reporting on Felix sales. The Art Newspaper reported slow sales and the LA Times ran a piece quoting the fair’s director who said that several booths had already sold out, but didn’t name them. I want to point out here, that my job is not that of a journalist first. I’m an art coach, who traveled to LA to be able to better advise the artists I work with. If it’s just me and a lone reporter from we’ve got problems.  

A similar low energy can be said for SPRING/BREAK. I love the event as a fair for artists, and the backend of the fair had a lot of great booths. A lot of the work struck me as something I might see at NADA Miami, in terms of quirkiness and style. But it was very sparsely attended. When I spoke with artists who had attended the opening, they told me very few people came out.  

This makes me sad. There’s plenty of good work at the fair. They were the only fair to host an art work that consisted of AI tarot reader that tap into your emails and produce readings (although I didn’t meet anyone who actually got a reading since the artist wasn’t in attendance when I anyone I knew as there, or myself.).  

The point is, there’s no reason not to attend, and lots of great artists to talk to. So, why weren’t people there? The same phenomenon occurred in New York this fall, which I chocked up to exhausting a location. They’d been in the same office space for four years and its run down appearance just didn’t work any more. But, it’s a little unclear why the same issue is happening in L.A.  

Here’s what I will say: I’m not convinced low attendance in either Felix or SPRING/BREAK LA can be chocked up to location or the quality of the art. I don’t have any definitive answers, but to speculate, I’d wager that despite reports of an energized crowd at Frieze, the market is soft, particularly in the emerging and middle market. And that’s showing up even in an environment that people are excited about—and is more visible at the emerging end of things where collectors who are experiencing fair fatigue are just not making it out to the secondary fairs in the same way they used to.  

Okay, last but certainly not least, let’s talk about the art.  

Stand out booths at Spring Break: Fred Fleisher curated a booth of Don Porcella crudely rendered sculptures made of wire mesh and colored pipe cleaners. In one arrangement of sculptures, a man in a suit with a baseball cap stands behind a deer carrying a glittery mouse on its back. A mouse, and a couple of logs surround each slightly smaller than life size figure. In another Charles Ray like constellation of family members -a tall woman with a gold club, a short man, and giant head with an unfurled tongue each sit on astroturf.  

One of the qualities I like about the work is that the mouths are open, revealing the structure of the work. They’re hollow. I kinda like that in a time when we seek out authenticity and realness — a quality that seems more allusive than ever — even the most honest rendering of materials reveals a hollowness inside. Even if you do blah blah [Keep]  

I mean, I doubt the artist made that work with my interpretation in mind, but I’m sure at least some of it would hold water with Porcello.  

Also worth mentioning, Venas Abiertas, an exhibition of photographic portraits by Rachelle Anayansi Mozman Solano. In these works, female models wearing turn of the century clothing or alternatively nudes pose with cardboard cutouts of cacti, and logs. In this environment I read the images as stage-like and referring to Hollywood and the colonization of the west. Molnar writes that “Mozman sets the stage for a psychological play, featuring a cast of characters from her life, to reflect on the emotional inheritance handed down from the impacts of colonization and white supremacy in Panamá.” So, I wasn’t too far off.  

Honestly there’s too much of note to go through everything, so quickly xe colorful painted still lives, Mary Henderson’s jewel-sized figurative paintings, and the dyed rubber boots marked by evaporating water by Michael Handley and curated by Jack Henry each stood out for their considered approach to the craft.  

Overall, we’re seeing far less ceramics, photography, and sculpture at the fairs, which is why a space like SPRING/BREAK is so important. The artists there show a variety of medium. The higher up the food chain you get, in the world of commerce, the less variation there is. Collectors aren’t really that adventurous.  

But, if you spend all day painting as your job, you’re gonna get pretty good at it. At Frieze Victoria Miro showed a new body of figurative works by Hernan Bas, someone I’ve noted in the past has grown tremendously as a painter. A series of subtly erotic young gay boys line one wall. The most striking work, a huge portrait of a young man in a suit behind a birthday cake ablaze with a million candles stands out. Youth springs eternal, as they say.  

But also Jordan Castell’s paintings at Casey Kaplan. Frankly the growth and her range of painterly applications is just astonishing. In one still life she leaves nearly have the canvas untouched - a beautiful spare touch. In another much more worked over piece, the individual marks making up a straw hat worn by a mother posing with her husband and child feel so considered.  

And at Felix, the weird alien like figures of Michael Kirkham at Harkawik gallery stood out for their bizarre proportions and striking color palette - one was very bright in color with whites and oranges while another stood out for its nighttime palette of blues and blacks. And Kavi Gupta’s exhibition including a hugely diverse range of artists including theater gates, Manish Nai, Miya Ando and more, gave the fair a well needed jolt from whiteness. I’ll admit to a weakness for all work by Jose Lerma, whose textured figurative collage sat tucked away in Gupta’s booth in the bathroom. And in full disclosure, this may have something to do with the fact that he lived a few doors down from me when I was in my twenties and some of the best conversations I’ve ever had about art were with him, about his own art and others. One of the most thoughtful artists I’ve ever met.  

Probably the biggest trend this year are heavy patterned or detailed paintings that look like they were inspired by rug design. These paintings are everywhere. Aide Rodriguez Lopez at Proyectos Monclova, Laura Owens at Matthew Marks, Jeff Perrone at Corbet vs Dempsey to name three of hundreds.  

I’m very susceptible to trends - whatever flavor of the month we’re at, I’m usually buying it. I suspect most of us are like that but it’s worth pointing them out, because trends are more fleeting than hard and fast interests. We want to be able to discern between the two, so we can recognize the difference between our taste and what’s hot at any given moment. It helps us make better art, and if you’re a collector, make better buying decisions.  

Okay, well that’s it for the podcast this week! Whether or not you attended the fairs, I hope you’re able to add some of these reflections to your contemporary art world knowledge base. This kind of stuff always comes up in conversation!  

I’ll see you back here next week!  

 

Paddy  

Read More
Paddy Johnson Paddy Johnson

[PODCAST] ART PROBLEMS: How to Come Back From an Extended Art Making Break

Shana Moulton, Meta/Physical Therapy, 2024, MoMA

If you have ever felt anxious about an extended art making break, let me put your mind at ease.

It happens to almost EVERYONE.

Whether that be due to child rearing, the loss of a parent, or a significant move, the job of getting back into the game can be just as challenging as the disruptions that took you away from the studio.

You're probably worried that...

You have visible gaps in your CV that galleries will notice and ask you about

You've lose touch with many of your contacts and art friends and now they're gone for good

Your fear of not being able to get back into the networking game, will keep you from getting back into the networking game.

In this podcast, I address those fears, identify the self defeating actions artists often take when in this position, and offer actionable alternatives.

You don't have to feel stuck.

And this podcast is designed to make sure you feel empowered to take action, rather than feeling mired in fear and self doubt.

Have a listen and let me know what you think!

Relevant links:

https://www.npr.org/programs/ted-radio-hour/1137460905/late-bloomers

Read More